Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars

Mengrong Wang; Xiaohang Qi; Yujie Shi; et al.

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cultivars. Therefore, a comparison was made between an old sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and a new sugarcane cultivar Zhongzhe9 (Z9). The experimental treatments were: without (R, Z), with straw of the same cultivar (RR, ZZ), and with straw of different cultivars (RZ, ZR). Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 — N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage and were not significant at the seedling stage. The contents of NO 3 — N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR. Straw returning with the same cultivar (RR, ZZ) significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community. The microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 (treatment Z) was greater than that of cultivar ROC22 (Treatment R). In the rhizosphere, the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms Gemmatimonadaceae, Trechispora, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc., increased after the straw returned. Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane., The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity. In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased. These findings collectively suggested that the impact of Z9 straw returning was more beneficial than ROC22 on the activity of rhizosphere microorganism’s soil functionality and sugarcane production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning improved soil total nitrogen content at the jointing stage by 73.21%.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee1
Treatment
Straw returninge1
Outcome
soil total nitrogene1
Direction
improvede1
Value
73.21%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 — N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning improved nitrate nitrogen content at the jointing stage by 119.61%.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee1
Treatment
Straw returninge1
Outcome
nitrate nitrogene1
Direction
improvede1
Value
119.61%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 — N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning improved soil organic carbon at the jointing stage by 20.16%.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee1
Treatment
Straw returninge1
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
improvede1
Value
20.16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 — N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning improved available potassium at the jointing stage by 90.65%.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee1
Treatment
Straw returninge1
Outcome
available potassiume1
Direction
improvede1
Value
90.65%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 — N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning effects on soil contents were not significant at the seedling stage.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee2
Treatment
Straw returninge1
Outcome
contentse1
Direction
not significante2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 — N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“were not significant at the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NO 3 — N content in RR and ZZ was 31.94 and 29.58%, higher than in RZ and ZR.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
RR and ZZe3
Outcome
NO 3 — Ne3
Direction
more thane3
Value
31.94 and 29.58%e3
Comparator
RZ and ZRe3

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The contents of NO 3 — N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available phosphorus in RR and ZZ was 53.21 and 27.19%, higher than in RZ and ZR.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
RR and ZZe3
Outcome
available phosphoruse3
Direction
more thane3
Value
53.21 and 27.19%e3
Comparator
RZ and ZRe3

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The contents of NO 3 — N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available potassium in RR and ZZ was 42.43 and 11.92%, higher than in RZ and ZR.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
RR and ZZe3
Outcome
available potassiume3
Direction
more thane3
Value
42.43 and 11.92%e3
Comparator
RZ and ZRe3

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The contents of NO 3 — N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning with the same cultivar significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Straw returning with the same cultivare4
Outcome
richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial communitye4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Straw returning with the same cultivar (RR, ZZ) significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1146 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 was greater than that of cultivar ROC22.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Material
cultivar Z9e5
Outcome
microbial diversitye5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
cultivar ROC22e5

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“The microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 (treatment Z) was greater than that of cultivar ROC22 (Treatment R)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returned increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
straw returnede6
Interactor
GemmatimonadaceaeGemmatimonadaceaee6other
Second interactor
TrechisporaTrechisporae6other
Outcome
relative abundance of beneficial microorganismse6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc.e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trechispora
Trechispora · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)James K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the rhizosphere, the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms Gemmatimonadaceae, Trechispora, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc., increased after the straw returned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane strawe7
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase7other
Second interactor
AspergillusAspergilluse7other
Outcome
activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergilluse7
Direction
enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane straw increased the yield of sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane strawe7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1538 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Material
Z9e1
Organ / stage
maturitye1
Outcome
richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial communitye1
Direction
increasede1

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1634 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Material
ROC22e1
Outcome
bacterial diversitye1
Direction
increasede1

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1707 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In ROC22, fungal diversity decreased.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Material
ROC22e1
Outcome
fungal diversitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning of Z9 was more beneficial than that of ROC22 for soil functionality and sugarcane production.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Z9 straw returninge1
Outcome
sugarcane productione1
Direction
more beneficiale1
Comparator
ROC22e1

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“These findings collectively suggested that the impact of Z9 straw returning was more beneficial than ROC22 on the activity of rhizosphere microorganism’s soil functionality and sugarcane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1906 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

organic · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.