Paper · 2010 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Sewage sludge as nitrogen and phosphorus source for cane-plant and first ratoon crops

Ademir Franco; Cassio Hamilton Abreu Junior; Dilermando Perecin; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of sewage sludge in Brazilian agriculture was regulated by the resolution no. 375 Conama, in 2006. However, there is a lack of research to adequate the mineral N and P fertilizer doses to be applied in agricultural fields treated with this residue. In a field experiment, the effects of application rates of sewage sludge and mineral N and P fertilizers on the productivity and technical characteristics of the cane-plant and first ratoon (residual effect) crops were evaluated. Four doses of sewage sludge (0, 3.6, 7.2 and 10.8 t ha-1, dry base), of N (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1) and of P2O5 (0, 60, 120 and 180 kg ha-1) were combined in a factorial and laid out on randomized block design, a with two replications. To evaluate the residual effect of the sludge, 120 kg ha-1 N and 140 kg ha-1 of K2O were applied in all plots. Sludge application at cane planting, with or without N and/or P fertilizer increased the stalk yield from 84 up to 118 t ha-1, with no alteration in the sugarcane quality, compared with the application of NPK fertilizer alone, resulting in a stalk yield of 91 t ha-1. The study of the response surface for stalk yield on lowfertility soil was the basis for a recommendation of mineral N and P fertilizer doses for sugarcane implantation as related to sewage sludge application rates. It was also concluded that a sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1, which is the sludge dose established based on the N criterion according to the resolution Conama nº 375, could a) reduce the use of mineral N by 100 % and of P2O5 by 30 %, with increments of 22 % in stalk yield, as a direct effect of sludge application to cane plant crop, and b) increase the stalk yield in the second harvest (first ratoon) by up to 12 % and sugar yield by up to 11 %, by the residual effect of sludge application to sugar cane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge application at planting increased sugarcane stalk yield from 84 to 118 t ha-1 compared with NPK fertilizer alone at 91 t ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Sludge application at cane planting, with or without N and/or P fertilizere0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
118 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
91 t ha-1e0
Comparator
application of NPK fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge application at cane planting, with or without N and/or P fertilizer increased the stalk yield from 84 up to 118 t ha-1, with no alteration in the sugarcane quality, compared with the application of NPK fertilizer alone, resulting in a stalk yield of 91 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge application at planting did not alter sugarcane quality compared with NPK fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Sludge application at cane planting, with or without N and/or P fertilizere0
Outcome
sugarcane qualitye0
Direction
no alteratione0
Comparator
application of NPK fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge application at cane planting, with or without N and/or P fertilizer increased the stalk yield from 84 up to 118 t ha-1, with no alteration in the sugarcane quality, compared with the application of NPK fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10.8 t ha-1 sewage sludge application could reduce mineral nitrogen use by 100%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1e0
Outcome
use of mineral Ne0
Direction
reducee0
Value
100 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1, which is the sludge dose established based on the N criterion according to the resolution Conama nº 375, could a) reduce the use of mineral N by 100 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1533 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10.8 t ha-1 sewage sludge application could reduce P2O5 use by 30%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1e0
Outcome
P2O5e0
Direction
reducee0
Value
30 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1, which is the sludge dose established based on the N criterion according to the resolution Conama nº 375, could a) reduce the use of mineral N by 100 % and of P2O5 by 30 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10.8 t ha-1 sewage sludge application increased cane-plant stalk yield by 22%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
cane plant crope0
Treatment
sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1e0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
22 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a sludge application of 10.8 t ha-1, which is the sludge dose established based on the N criterion according to the resolution Conama nº 375, could a) reduce the use of mineral N by 100 % and of P2O5 by 30 %, with increments of 22 % in stalk yield, as a direct effect of sludge application to cane plant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of sewage sludge increased first ratoon stalk yield by up to 12%.

Taxon
sugar canee0
Organ / stage
first ratoone0
Treatment
residual effect of sludge applicatione0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
up to 12 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase the stalk yield in the second harvest (first ratoon) by up to 12 % and sugar yield by up to 11 %, by the residual effect of sludge application to sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of sewage sludge increased first ratoon sugar yield by up to 11%.

Taxon
sugar canee0
Organ / stage
first ratoone0
Treatment
residual effect of sludge applicatione0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
up to 11 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase the stalk yield in the second harvest (first ratoon) by up to 12 % and sugar yield by up to 11 %, by the residual effect of sludge application to sugar cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1828 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 20 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

organic · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.