Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Climate Smart Nitrogen and Water Management Approaches on Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn

Nishith Das; Lalita Mohan Garnayak; A. K. Patra; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out for two consecutive years during 2020-21 and 2021-22 in the research farm of OUAT, Bhubaneswar. The experiment was conducted in a strip plot design having four each of climate smart water and nutrient management approaches replicated four times. All the growth attributes like plant height, LAI, dry matter production as well as the yield attributing characters were superior under EFI with mulch and INM treatments in water and nitrogen management approaches, respectively. Optimal irrigation practice i.e. each furrow irrigation (EFI) with mulch in sweet corn resulted in higher cob yield (27.64 t/ha) followed by EFI alone. Similarly, INM practices comprising of 75% STBNR + 25% N through FYM produced higher cob yield (30.91 t/ha) as compared to other N-management options and was closely followed by STBNR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EFI with mulch produced superior growth attributes and yield-attributing characters.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
EFI with mulche0
Outcome
plant height, LAI, dry matter productione0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the growth attributes like plant height, LAI, dry matter production as well as the yield attributing characters were superior under EFI with mulch and INM treatments in water and nitrogen management approaches, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM produced superior growth attributes and yield-attributing characters.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
yield attributing characterse0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the growth attributes like plant height, LAI, dry matter production as well as the yield attributing characters were superior under EFI with mulch and INM treatments in water and nitrogen management approaches, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EFI with mulch gave higher cob yield of 27.64 t/ha than EFI alone.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
each furrow irrigation (EFI) with mulche0
Outcome
cob yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.64 t/hae0
Comparator
EFI alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“each furrow irrigation (EFI) with mulch in sweet corn resulted in higher cob yield (27.64 t/ha) followed by EFI alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM with 75% STBNR and 25% N through FYM gave higher cob yield of 30.91 t/ha than other nitrogen options.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
75% STBNR + 25% N through FYMe0
Outcome
cob yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.91 t/hae0
Comparator
other N-management optionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“INM practices comprising of 75% STBNR + 25% N through FYM produced higher cob yield (30.91 t/ha) as compared to other N-management options and was closely followed by STBNR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–846 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Without nitrogen in the wet year, mulched plots yielded much less.

    Effect of a Killed Sod Mulch on Nitrate Movement and Corn Yield1 · 1973 · compared with conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment

    Opposite direction

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.