Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Specific and Intraspecific P Efficiency of Small-Grain Legumes as Affected by Long-Term P Management

Yue Hu; Klaus J. Dehmer; Evelin Willner; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Legumes have a high demand for phosphorus (P) but also have effective physiological and morphological strategies of P mobilisation. In order to evaluate the inter- and intraspecific P efficiency of small-grain legumes under contrasting long-term P management, eight accessions each of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) were cultivated in two consecutive growing periods from 2020 to 2021 in a field trial established in 1998. Six treatments (no P, triple-superphosphate (TSP), biomass ash, cattle manure, biowaste compost, and biowaste compost + TSP) were considered as P sources. While the yield clearly varied between both growing seasons, the differences between alfalfa and red clover were relatively small (4.7 vs. 4.9 Mg ha−1 in 2020 and 12.0 vs. 10.5 Mg ha−1 in 2021, p < 0.05). Even after more than 20 years of P management, crop yields were hardly affected by mineral P sources (TSP and biomass ash) while organic fertilisers increased the yields and nutrient uptake of plants and also raised soil P pools and the activities of soil enzymes in comparison to the control. A relevant crop effect was only found for the nitrogen (N) leaching with higher mineral N contents in 60 to 90 cm soil depth measured for red clover compared to alfalfa (11.8 vs. 4.8 kg ha−1, p < 0.05). Our results emphasise the high P efficiency of small-grain legumes without pronounced inter- or intraspecific differences. The yield-enhancing effect of organic amendments was related to higher soil fertility rather than to P supply.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa yield was 4.7 Mg ha−1 in 2020 and 12.0 Mg ha−1 in 2021.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
4.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa and red clover were relatively small (4.7 vs. 4.9 Mg ha−1 in 2020 and 12.0 vs. 10.5 Mg ha−1 in 2021, p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“While the yield clearly varied between both growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–674 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red clover yield was 4.9 Mg ha−1 in 2020.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
4.9 Mg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa and red clover were relatively small (4.7 vs. 4.9 Mg ha−1 in 2020 and 12.0 vs. 10.5 Mg ha−1 in 2021, p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“While the yield clearly varied between both growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral phosphorus sources hardly affected crop yields.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
mineral P sourcese0
Outcome
crop yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“crop yields were hardly affected by mineral P sources (TSP and biomass ash)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers increased plant yields relative to control.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
organic fertiliserse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilisers increased the yields and nutrient uptake of plants and also raised soil P pools and the activities of soil enzymes in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers increased plant nutrient uptake relative to control.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
organic fertiliserse0
Outcome
nutrient uptake of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilisers increased the yields and nutrient uptake of plants and also raised soil P pools and the activities of soil enzymes in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers raised soil phosphorus pools relative to control.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
organic fertiliserse0
Outcome
soil P poolse0
Direction
raisede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilisers increased the yields and nutrient uptake of plants and also raised soil P pools and the activities of soil enzymes in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers raised soil enzyme activities relative to control.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
organic fertiliserse0
Outcome
activities of soil enzymese0
Direction
raisede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilisers increased the yields and nutrient uptake of plants and also raised soil P pools and the activities of soil enzymes in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red clover plots had higher mineral nitrogen in 60 to 90 cm soil depth than alfalfa plots.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Outcome
mineral N contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.8e0
Comparator
alfalfae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher mineral N contents in 60 to 90 cm soil depth measured for red clover compared to alfalfa (11.8 vs. 4.8 kg ha−1, p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1315 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendment yield gains were related to higher soil fertility.

Taxon
organic amendmentse0
Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Outcome
yield-enhancing effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The yield-enhancing effect of organic amendments was related to higher soil fertility rather than to P supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1550 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.