Paper · 2023 · Pathogens

Optimized High Throughput Ascochyta Blight Screening Protocols and Immunity to A. pisi in Pea

Emmanuel N. Annan; Bernard Nyamesorto; Qing Yan; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ascochyta blight (AB) is a destructive disease of the field pea (Pisum sativum L.) caused by necrotrophic fungal pathogens known as the AB-disease complex. To identify resistant individuals to assist AB resistance breeding, low-cost, high throughput, and reliable protocols for AB screening are needed. We tested and optimized three protocols to determine the optimum type of pathogen inoculum, the optimal development stage for host inoculation, and the timing of inoculation for detached-leaf assays. We found that different plant development stages do not affect AB infection type on peas, but the timing of inoculation affects the infection type of detached leaves due to wound-induced host defense response. After screening nine pea cultivars, we discovered that cultivar Fallon was immune to A. pisi but not to A. pinodes or the mixture of the two species. Our findings suggest that AB screening can be done with any of the three protocols. A whole-plant inoculation assay is necessary for identifying resistance to stem/node infection. Pathogen inoculation must be completed within 1.5 h post-detachment to avoid false positives of resistance for detach-leaf assays. It is essential to use a purified single-species inoculum for resistant resource screenings to identify the host resistance to each single species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant developmental stage did not affect Ascochyta blight infection type.

Organ / stage
plant development stagese0
Outcome
AB infection typee0
Direction
do not affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different plant development stages do not affect AB infection type on peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation timing affected infection type in detached leaves.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
detached leavese0
Treatment
timing of inoculatione0
Outcome
infection type of detached leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the timing of inoculation affects the infection type of detached leaves due to wound-induced host defense response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallon was immune to A. pisi.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Fallone0
Interactor
A. pisiAscochyta pisie0pathogen
Outcome
immune to A. pisie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar Fallon was immune to A. pisi but not to A. pinodes or the mixture of the two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallon was not immune to A. pinodes.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Fallone0
Interactor
A. pinodesDidymella pinodese0pathogen
Outcome
not to A. pinodese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Didymella pinodes
Didymella pinodes · InteractorWheelwalker · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar Fallon was immune to A. pisi but not to A. pinodes or the mixture of the two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallon was not immune to the two-species mixture.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Fallone0
Outcome
not to A. pinodes or the mixture of the two speciese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar Fallon was immune to A. pisi but not to A. pinodes or the mixture of the two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Any of the three protocols can be used for AB screening.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
AB screening can be done with any of the three protocolse0
Value
threee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our findings suggest that AB screening can be done with any of the three protocols.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant inoculation is necessary to identify resistance to stem and node infection.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
whole-plant inoculation assay is necessary for identifying resistance to stem/node infectione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A whole-plant inoculation assay is necessary for identifying resistance to stem/node infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For detached-leaf assays, inoculation must occur within 1.5 hours after detachment.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
Pathogen inoculation must be completed within 1.5 h post-detachmente0
Value
1.5 he0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pathogen inoculation must be completed within 1.5 h post-detachment to avoid false positives of resistance for detach-leaf assays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Purified single-species inoculum is essential to screen resistance to individual species.

Taxon
field pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
use a purified single-species inoculum for resistant resource screeningse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to use a purified single-species inoculum for resistant resource screenings to identify the host resistance to each single species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑