Paper · 2023 · South African Journal of Botany

Does Azospirillum brasilense mitigate water stress and reduce the use of nitrogen fertilizers in maize?

Daniele Maria Marques; Paulo César Magalhães; Ivanildo Evódio Marriel; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To determine whether Azospirillum brasilense mitigates water stress and lowers nitrogen fertilizer consumption in maize, physiology (pigments, nitrate reductase gas exchange, and water potential), macro/micronutrients, root shape, and biomass were studied. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse and included seven treatments and four replications. Plants under water deficits were inoculated with Azospirillum strains (Az1 and Az2) under two nitrogen fertilization conditions (20 and 120 kg ha−1) and compared to control plants (with irrigation and fertilization of 120 kg ha−1 without inoculation). Inoculation with Az1 increased the pigment content under water stress, mainly in the 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen treatment. The maize root system showed the best response to inoculation with A. brasilense. The plants with inoculant Az1 at 120 kg ha−1 N responded similar to the control plants, which were under ideal growing conditions for length, surface area, root diameter and shoot and root dry mass. Inoculation with A. brasilense Az1 and 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen under water stress improved the physiology and root morphology of maize. However, the use of inoculation does not replace nitrogen fertilization in maize, and the possible reasons and consequences are discussed. Inoculation of plants with A. brasilense is an effective strategy that should be applied in maize production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az1 inoculation increased pigment content under water stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculation with Az1e0
Interactor
Az1e0symbiont
Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under water stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Az1 increased the pigment content under water stress, mainly in the 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az1 with 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen gave root and dry mass responses similar to irrigated controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inoculant Az1 at 120 kg ha−1 Ne0
Interactor
Az1e0symbiont
Outcome
length, surface area, root diameter and shoot and root dry masse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants with inoculant Az1 at 120 kg ha−1 N responded similar to the control plants, which were under ideal growing conditions for length, surface area, root diameter and shoot and root dry mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az1 inoculation with 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen improved maize physiology and root morphology under water stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Inoculation with A. brasilense Az1 and 120 kg ha−1 nitrogene0
Interactor
A. brasilense Az1Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
physiology and root morphologye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with A. brasilense Az1 and 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen under water stress improved the physiology and root morphology of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not replace nitrogen fertilization in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
does not replace nitrogen fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of inoculation does not replace nitrogen fertilization in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1220 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend A. brasilense inoculation in maize production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
should be applied in maize productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of plants with A. brasilense is an effective strategy that should be applied in maize production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1388 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

95 papers: 85 positive, 10 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.