Paper · 2023 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Investigation of the Effect of Thermal Tension in Hot Seasons and Interruption of Irrigation at the End of the Growth Season by Silicon Nutrient Solution Sulfonated With S8 Elemental Sulfur on Fresh and Dry Fodder Yield and Protein Content of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

Sayad Parastar Anzabi; Parviz Shirinzaheh Giglou; Elham Parastar Anzabi; et al.

5
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research is an introduction to the combined nutrient of mineral salts by Silicon sulfonated with S8 through aerial organs of the Alfalfa plant. This type of combined nutrition by S8 is called “Matrix Nutrition”. This experiment was launched in October 2022 to study the effect of S8 on increasing the yield of fresh and dry fodder and the percentage of Alfalfa protein content using combined nutrition or Matrix Nutrition on the aerial organ of Alfalfa plant in the condition of interruption of irrigation at the end of the growing season in Moghan region, Ardabil province in Iran. The experiment was carried out in 2 plots, each one being one-hectare land. (In the first plot, S8 was applied for 5 litres per 1000 litres of water in the growth stages as foliar spraying after each crop harvest. No S8 was applied in the second plot.) The 5th and 6th harvests coincided with a dry season in this region and no irrigation was applied in this experiment for the 5th and 6th harvests. Both plots were only irrigated similarly for 1st to 4th harvest. The results obtained from a total of 5 harvests of the Hamedani Variant Alfalfa plant in the Control Plot and 6 harvests of the Hamedani Variant Alfalfa plant in the Experiment Plot indicated the highest yield in the 1st plot treated with S8 in terms of fresh and dry fodder, percentage of dry materials of fodder and protein content with a significant difference of 1% and 5% compared to Control Plot. The difference between the two plots was: fresh fodder 11,610 Kgs/Hectare, i.e., 91.27% higher yield, dry fodder 4,099 Kgs/Hectare, i.e., 140.95% higher yield, increase in dry material percentage for 5.99% and higher protein content of fodder for 1.59% which indicated a significant positive effect of application of S8 nutrient solution as foliar spraying on the increase of yield in fresh and dry fodder in the growing season and specifically at the time of thermal tension (specifically on 2nd and 4th harvest in control plot on June and August) and interruption of irrigation at the end of growth season (5th and 6th harvest of experiment plot).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S8 foliar spraying increased fresh fodder yield by 91.27% (11,610 Kgs/Hectare) compared with the control plot.

Taxon
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Medicago sativat0
Treatment
S8 nutrient solution as foliar sprayinge2
Outcome
fresh foddere1
Direction
highere1
Value
91.27%e1
Comparator
Control Plote3
Setting
Moghan region, Ardabil province in Irane4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 243–271 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh fodder 11,610 Kgs/Hectare, i.e., 91.27% higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1556 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of S8 nutrient solution as foliar spraying on the increase of yield in fresh and dry fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1861 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to Control Plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1454 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moghan region, Ardabil province in Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S8 foliar spraying increased dry fodder yield by 140.95% (4,099 Kgs/Hectare) compared with the control plot.

Taxon
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Medicago sativat0
Treatment
S8 nutrient solution as foliar sprayinge2
Outcome
dry foddere1
Direction
highere1
Value
140.95%e1
Comparator
Control Plote3
Setting
Moghan region, Ardabil province in Irane4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 243–271 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry fodder 4,099 Kgs/Hectare, i.e., 140.95% higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1614 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of S8 nutrient solution as foliar spraying on the increase of yield in fresh and dry fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1861 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to Control Plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1454 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moghan region, Ardabil province in Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S8 foliar spraying increased the dry material percentage of fodder by 5.99% compared with the control plot.

Taxon
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Medicago sativat0
Treatment
S8 nutrient solution as foliar sprayinge2
Outcome
dry material percentagee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
5.99%e1
Comparator
Control Plote3
Setting
Moghan region, Ardabil province in Irane4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 243–271 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in dry material percentage for 5.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1661 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of S8 nutrient solution as foliar spraying on the increase of yield in fresh and dry fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1861 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to Control Plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1454 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moghan region, Ardabil province in Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S8 foliar spraying gave fodder a 1.59% higher protein content than the control plot.

Taxon
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Medicago sativat0
Treatment
S8 nutrient solution as foliar sprayinge2
Outcome
protein content of foddere1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.59%e1
Comparator
Control Plote3
Setting
Moghan region, Ardabil province in Irane4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 243–271 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher protein content of fodder for 1.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1708 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of S8 nutrient solution as foliar spraying on the increase of yield in fresh and dry fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1861 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to Control Plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1454 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moghan region, Ardabil province in Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S8 foliar spraying had a significant positive effect on fresh and dry fodder yield in the growing season, specifically at the time of thermal tension.

Taxon
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Medicago sativat0
Treatment
S8 nutrient solution as foliar sprayinge1
Outcome
yield in fresh and dry foddere1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
specifically at the time of thermal tensione2
Comparator
Control Plote3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 243–271 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of S8 nutrient solution as foliar spraying on the increase of yield in fresh and dry fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1861 · show in text ↑
e2

“specifically at the time of thermal tension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–1931 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to Control Plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1454 · show in text ↑

application · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

application · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 151 positive, 33 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.