Paper · 2023 · Microorganisms

Yield and Rhizosphere Soil Environment of Greenhouse Zucchini in Response to Different Planting and Breeding Waste Composts

Jianzhong Tie; Yali Qiao; Ning Jin; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Composting, planting, and breeding waste for return to the field is the most crucial soil improvement method under the resource utilization of agricultural waste. However, how the vegetable yield and rhizosphere soil environment respond to different composts is still unknown. Therefore, eight formulations were designed for compost fermentation using agricultural waste [sheep manure (SM), tail vegetable (TV), cow manure (CM), mushroom residue (MR), and corn straw (CS)] without fertilizer (CK1) and local commercial organic fertilizer (CK2) as controls to study the yield and rhizosphere soil environment of greenhouse zucchini in response to different planting and breeding waste compost. Applying planting and breeding waste compost significantly increased the soil’s organic matter and nutrient content. It inhibited soil acidification, which T4 (SM:TV:CS = 6:3:1) and T7 (SM:TV:MR:CS = 6:2:1:1) treatments affected significantly. Compared to CK2 treatment, T4 and T7 treatments showed a greater increase, with a significant increase of 14.69% and 11.01%, respectively. Therefore, T4, T7, and two control treatments were selected for high-throughput sequencing based on yield performance. Compared with the CK1 treatment, although multiple applications of chemical fertilizers led to a decrease in bacterial and fungal richness, planting and breeding waste compost maintained bacterial diversity and enhanced fungal diversity. Compared to CK2, the relative abundance increased in T7-treated Proteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Lysobacter) and T4-treated Bacteroidetes (Flavobacterium) among bacteria. An increase in T4-treated Ascomycota (Zopfiella and Fusarium) and Basidiomycota among fungi and a decrease in T7-treated Mortierellomycota have been observed. Functional predictions of the bacterial Tax4Fun and fungal FUNGuild revealed that applying planting and breeding waste compost from the T4 treatment significantly increased the abundance of soil bacterial Metabolism of Cities, Genetic Information Processing, and Cellular Processes decreased the abundance of Pathotroph and Saprotroph-Symbiotroph fungi and increased the abundance of Saprotroph fungi. Overall, planting and breeding waste compost increased zucchini yield by improving soil fertility and microbial community structure. Among them, T4 treatment has the most significant effect, so T4 treatment can be selected as the optimized formulation of local commercial organic fertilizer. These findings have valuable implications for sustainable agricultural development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying planting and breeding waste compost significantly increased soil organic matter and nutrient content.

Treatment
Applying planting and breeding waste composte1
Outcome
soil’s organic matter and nutrient contente1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Applying planting and breeding waste compost significantly increased the soil’s organic matter and nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–808 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting and breeding waste compost inhibited soil acidification, significantly for the T4 and T7 treatments.

Treatment
T4 (SM:TV:CS = 6:3:1) and T7 (SM:TV:MR:CS = 6:2:1:1)e1
Outcome
soil acidificatione1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It inhibited soil acidification, which T4 (SM:TV:CS = 6:3:1) and T7 (SM:TV:MR:CS = 6:2:1:1) treatments affected significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–935 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T4 compost treatment showed a significant increase of 14.69% compared with CK2.

Treatment
T4e1
Direction
increasee1
Value
14.69%e1
Comparator
CK2 treatmente1

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to CK2 treatment, T4 and T7 treatments showed a greater increase, with a significant increase of 14.69% and 11.01%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1074 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T7 compost treatment showed a significant increase of 11.01% compared with CK2.

Treatment
T7e1
Direction
increasee1
Value
11.01%e1
Comparator
CK2 treatmente1

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to CK2 treatment, T4 and T7 treatments showed a greater increase, with a significant increase of 14.69% and 11.01%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1074 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated chemical fertilizer applications decreased bacterial and fungal richness compared with CK1.

Treatment
multiple applications of chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
bacterial and fungal richnesse1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
CK1 treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared with the CK1 treatment, although multiple applications of chemical fertilizers led to a decrease in bacterial and fungal richness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1333 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting and breeding waste compost maintained bacterial diversity compared with CK1.

Treatment
planting and breeding waste composte1
Outcome
bacterial diversitye1
Direction
maintainede1
Comparator
CK1 treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“planting and breeding waste compost maintained bacterial diversity and enhanced fungal diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with the CK1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting and breeding waste compost enhanced fungal diversity compared with CK1.

Treatment
planting and breeding waste composte1
Outcome
fungal diversitye1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
CK1 treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“planting and breeding waste compost maintained bacterial diversity and enhanced fungal diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with the CK1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative abundance of Proteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Lysobacter) increased in T7-treated zucchini soil compared with CK2.

Treatment
T7e1
Outcome
Proteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Lysobacter)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
CK2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to CK2, the relative abundance increased in T7-treated Proteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Lysobacter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1555 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (Flavobacterium) increased in T4-treated zucchini soil compared with CK2.

Treatment
T4e1
Outcome
Bacteroidetes (Flavobacterium)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
CK2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to CK2, the relative abundance increased in T7-treated Proteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Lysobacter) and T4-treated Bacteroidetes (Flavobacterium) among bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1616 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T4 treatment increased the relative abundance of fungal Ascomycota (Zopfiella and Fusarium) and Basidiomycota.

Treatment
T4e1
Outcome
Ascomycota (Zopfiella and Fusarium) and Basidiomycotae1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An increase in T4-treated Ascomycota (Zopfiella and Fusarium) and Basidiomycota among fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1709 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T7 treatment decreased the relative abundance of Mortierellomycota fungi.

Treatment
T7e1
Outcome
Mortierellomycotae1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a decrease in T7-treated Mortierellomycota have been observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1775 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

The T4 compost significantly increased the predicted abundance of soil bacterial Metabolism of Cities, Genetic Information Processing, and Cellular Processes.

Treatment
planting and breeding waste compost from the T4 treatmente1
Outcome
abundance of soil bacterial Metabolism of Cities, Genetic Information Processing, and Cellular Processese1
Direction
significantly increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“applying planting and breeding waste compost from the T4 treatment significantly increased the abundance of soil bacterial Metabolism of Cities, Genetic Information Processing, and Cellular Processes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–2058 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The T4 compost decreased the predicted abundance of Pathotroph and Saprotroph-Symbiotroph fungi.

Treatment
T4e1
Outcome
abundance of Pathotroph and Saprotroph-Symbiotroph fungie2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“applying planting and breeding waste compost from the T4 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1925 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased the abundance of Pathotroph and Saprotroph-Symbiotroph fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2059–2129 · show in text ↑
e3

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The T4 compost increased the predicted abundance of Saprotroph fungi.

Treatment
T4e1
Outcome
abundance of Saprotroph fungie2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“applying planting and breeding waste compost from the T4 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1925 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the abundance of Saprotroph fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2134–2177 · show in text ↑
e3

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting and breeding waste compost increased zucchini yield by improving soil fertility and microbial community structure.

Treatment
planting and breeding waste composte1
Outcome
zucchini yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
by improving soil fertility and microbial community structuree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Overall, planting and breeding waste compost increased zucchini yield by improving soil fertility and microbial community structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2310 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

T4 treatment had the most significant effect and can be selected as the optimized formulation of local commercial organic fertilizer.

Treatment
T4 treatmente1
Outcome
optimized formulation of local commercial organic fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among them, T4 treatment has the most significant effect, so T4 treatment can be selected as the optimized formulation of local commercial organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2469 · show in text ↑
e2

“greenhouse zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–630 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Cucurbita pepoPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucurbita pepoPositive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · ecology: diversity · Cucurbita pepoResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cucurbita pepoResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.