Paper · 2022 · PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE

Optimal time of plant growth regulator application to Sorghum canopy according to BBCH and Kuperman crop growth scales

Oleh Prysiazhniuk; Larysa Storozhyk; Mykhailo Humentyk; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the problem of choosing the optimal scale for identifying the phases of plant development in order to determine the best timing of agronomic operations for sorghum plant care. The aim of the experiment was to use a plant growth regulator with higher efficiency during the stages of crop development 21, 31, 37 (BBCH) and III, IV, VI-VII on the Kupperman scale. Field and laboratory research methods were used in the study. The experiment was conducted in the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine on two sorghum varieties - Sorghum bicolor and Sorghum saccharatum, which were treated with PGR. Foliar application of PGR (0.5 l/ha) at 21 and 31 stages of BBSH provides 2.8 and 4.9% better results than at III and IV stages according to the Kuperman scale (the latter is based on a comprehensive morphophysiological analysis to identify I-VII CGS). Foliar application of PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH) contributed to faster development and increased grain yield in sorghum varieties (0.19 t/ha in Odesskyi 205 and 0.12 t/ha in Lan 59) compared to application at stage III (according to Cooperman). A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%, while in Gulliver variety these indicators were 1.6 t/ha, 0.7 t/ha and 0.2%, respectively. Thus, it is recommended to use the BBCH scale for the application of PPP, and foliar fertilization with PPP should be carried out at 21 and 31 days. The practical value of the work lies in the selection of the scale of growth and development of sorghum crops and the timing of foliar fertilization, which is optimal for the conditions of Ukraine. The study is useful from the practical point of view of foliar nutrition of plants in production and as a theoretical assessment of the scale of plant growth and development for students and scientists.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application at BBCH stage 21 gave 2.8% better results than Kuperman stage III.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
PGR (0.5 l/ha) at 21e0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
2.8e0
Comparator
IIIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of PGR (0.5 l/ha) at 21 and 31 stages of BBSH provides 2.8 and 4.9% better results than at III and IV stages according to the Kuperman scale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application at BBCH stage 31 gave 4.9% better results than Kuperman stage IV.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
PGR (0.5 l/ha) at 21 and 31 stages of BBSHe0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
4.9%e0
Comparator
IVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of PGR (0.5 l/ha) at 21 and 31 stages of BBSH provides 2.8 and 4.9% better results than at III and IV stages according to the Kuperman scale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR at BBCH stage 21 accelerated sorghum development versus Kuperman stage III.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
developmente0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
application at stage IIIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH) contributed to faster development and increased grain yield in sorghum varieties (0.19 t/ha in Odesskyi 205 and 0.12 t/ha in Lan 59) compared to application at stage III (according to Cooperman).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR at BBCH stage 21 increased grain yield by 0.19 t/ha in Odesskyi 205 versus stage III.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
Odesskyi 205e0
Treatment
PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.19 t/hae0
Comparator
application at stage IIIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH) contributed to faster development and increased grain yield in sorghum varieties (0.19 t/ha in Odesskyi 205 and 0.12 t/ha in Lan 59) compared to application at stage III (according to Cooperman).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR at BBCH stage 21 increased grain yield by 0.12 t/ha in Lan 59 versus stage III.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
Lan 59e0
Treatment
PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.12 t/hae0
Comparator
application at stage IIIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of PGR at microstage 21 (BBCH) contributed to faster development and increased grain yield in sorghum varieties (0.19 t/ha in Odesskyi 205 and 0.12 t/ha in Lan 59) compared to application at stage III (according to Cooperman).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dovista biomass yield rose by 1.6 t/ha with BBCH stage 21 PGR versus Kuperman stage III.

Taxon
sugar sorghume0
Material
Dovistae0
Treatment
PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.6 t/hae0
Comparator
stage III (Kuperman)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dovista dry matter rose by 0.7 t/ha with BBCH stage 21 PGR versus stage III.

Taxon
sugar sorghume0
Material
Dovistae0
Treatment
PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.7 t/hae0
Comparator
stage III (Kuperman)e0

Verbatim

e0

“A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dovista stem-juice sugar content changed by 0.0% with BBCH stage 21 PGR versus stage III.

Taxon
sugar sorghume0
Material
Dovistae0
Treatment
PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
sugar content in stem juicee0
Value
0.0%e0
Comparator
stage III (Kuperman)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gulliver biomass yield rose by 1.6 t/ha with BBCH stage 21 PGR versus stage III.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
Gullivere0
Treatment
PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.6 t/hae0
Comparator
stage III (Kuperman)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%, while in Gulliver variety these indicators were 1.6 t/ha, 0.7 t/ha and 0.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gulliver dry matter rose by 0.7 t/ha with BBCH stage 21 PGR versus stage III.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
Gullivere0
Treatment
PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.7 t/hae0
Comparator
stage III (Kuperman)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%, while in Gulliver variety these indicators were 1.6 t/ha, 0.7 t/ha and 0.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gulliver stem-juice sugar content rose by 0.2% with BBCH stage 21 PGR versus stage III.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
Gullivere0
Treatment
PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH)e0
Outcome
sugar content in stem juicee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.2%e0
Comparator
stage III (Kuperman)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar effect of PGR application at microstage 21 (BBCH) compared to stage III (Kuperman) was recorded for two sugar sorghum hybrids: in Dovista variety, the increase in biomass yield was 1.6 t/ha, dry matter - 0.7 t/ha, and sugar content in stem juice - 0.0%, while in Gulliver variety these indicators were 1.6 t/ha, 0.7 t/ha and 0.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the BBCH scale for PPP application.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
use the BBCH scale for the application of PPPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended to use the BBCH scale for the application of PPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar PPP fertilization at 21 and 31 days.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
foliar fertilization with PPP should be carried out at 21 and 31 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar fertilization with PPP should be carried out at 21 and 31 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑

class · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

class · growth · SorghumResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.