Paper · 2023 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

Influence of levels of mineral nutrition and foliar feeding on the change in morpho-biometric parameters of barley plants

Stepan Stepanovich Yakomaskin; Vasily Ivanovich Kargin; Alexey Alekseevich Zubarev

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

As a result of the experiments carried out in 2020–2022, which were laid at the Bogdanovskoye Agricultural Enterprise LLC in the Staroshaigovsky District of the Republic of Mordovia on the alluvial soil of the Sivin River the influence of the levels of mineral nutrition and foliar feeding with liquid complex fertilizers "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" on the morpho-biometric parameters of barley plants was established. The fertilization contributed to an increase in plant height by 4.5–9.5 cm and ear length by 0.6–1.5 cm. The highest plant height (73.0 cm), ear length (8.4 cm), grain weight per ear (0.69–0.78 g) and the weight of 1000 grains (39.6–41.7 g) was in the third variant (N60P60K60). Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" positively influenced the change in the height of barley plants by 2.7–5.9 cm, ear length by 0.7–1.6 cm, grain weight per ear and weight of 1000 grains. A further increase in the level of mineral nutrition (N90P90K90) and foliar fertilizing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" in the amount of 6 l/ha did not contribute to a significant change in the studied parameters. Mineral fertilizers on average over three years increased the yield of barley by 14.6–5.8%, the highest values was after N60P60K60 fertilization. Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" increased crop yield by 0.31–0.56 t/ha, or 11.4–16.7%, depending on the level of mineral nutrition. The most favorable factors for the formation of the barley crop were after application of mineral fertilizers in the amount of N60P60K60 (3.40–3.95 t/ha) and foliar top dressing of "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" in the amount of 4 l/ha (3 92 t/ha), this is evidenced by the data of the studied biometric indicators of plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization raised barley height by 4.5–9.5 cm.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.5–9.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilization contributed to an increase in plant height by 4.5–9.5 cm and ear length by 0.6–1.5 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization raised barley ear length by 0.6–1.5 cm.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
ear lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.6–1.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilization contributed to an increase in plant height by 4.5–9.5 cm and ear length by 0.6–1.5 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P60K60 gave highest plant height at 73.0 cm.

Treatment
N60P60K60e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
73.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height (73.0 cm), ear length (8.4 cm), grain weight per ear (0.69–0.78 g) and the weight of 1000 grains (39.6–41.7 g) was in the third variant (N60P60K60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P60K60 gave highest ear length at 8.4 cm.

Treatment
N60P60K60e0
Outcome
ear lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.4 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height (73.0 cm), ear length (8.4 cm), grain weight per ear (0.69–0.78 g) and the weight of 1000 grains (39.6–41.7 g) was in the third variant (N60P60K60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P60K60 gave highest grain weight per ear at 0.69–0.78 g.

Treatment
N60P60K60e0
Outcome
grain weight per eare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.69–0.78 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height (73.0 cm), ear length (8.4 cm), grain weight per ear (0.69–0.78 g) and the weight of 1000 grains (39.6–41.7 g) was in the third variant (N60P60K60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P60K60 gave highest weight of 1000 grains at 39.6–41.7 g.

Treatment
N60P60K60e0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.6–41.7 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height (73.0 cm), ear length (8.4 cm), grain weight per ear (0.69–0.78 g) and the weight of 1000 grains (39.6–41.7 g) was in the third variant (N60P60K60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Agris raised barley height by 2.7–5.9 cm.

Treatment
Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy"e0
Outcome
height of barley plantse0
Direction
positively influencede0
Value
2.7–5.9 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" positively influenced the change in the height of barley plants by 2.7–5.9 cm, ear length by 0.7–1.6 cm, grain weight per ear and weight of 1000 grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Agris raised barley ear length by 0.7–1.6 cm.

Treatment
Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy"e0
Outcome
ear lengthe0
Direction
positively influencede0
Value
0.7–1.6 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" positively influenced the change in the height of barley plants by 2.7–5.9 cm, ear length by 0.7–1.6 cm, grain weight per ear and weight of 1000 grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Agris positively influenced grain weight per ear and 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy"e0
Outcome
grain weight per ear and weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" positively influenced the change in the height of barley plants by 2.7–5.9 cm, ear length by 0.7–1.6 cm, grain weight per ear and weight of 1000 grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Further N90P90K90 and 6 l/ha foliar fertilizer did not significantly alter measured traits.

Treatment
N90P90K90e0
Outcome
studied parameterse0
Direction
did not contribute to a significant changee0
Qualifier
6 l/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A further increase in the level of mineral nutrition (N90P90K90) and foliar fertilizing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" in the amount of 6 l/ha did not contribute to a significant change in the studied parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased barley yield by 14.6–5.8%.

Treatment
Mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield of barleye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.6–5.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral fertilizers on average over three years increased the yield of barley by 14.6–5.8%, the highest values was after N60P60K60 fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P60K60 produced the highest barley yield response.

Treatment
N60P60K60 fertilizatione0
Outcome
yield of barleye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral fertilizers on average over three years increased the yield of barley by 14.6–5.8%, the highest values was after N60P60K60 fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Agris increased barley yield by 0.31–0.56 t/ha.

Treatment
Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy"e0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.31–0.56 t/hae0
Qualifier
depending on the level of mineral nutritione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar top dressing with "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" increased crop yield by 0.31–0.56 t/ha, or 11.4–16.7%, depending on the level of mineral nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P60K60 gave barley yields of 3.40–3.95 t/ha.

Treatment
N60P60K60e0
Outcome
formation of the barley crope0
Direction
most favorablee0
Value
3.40–3.95 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most favorable factors for the formation of the barley crop were after application of mineral fertilizers in the amount of N60P60K60 (3.40–3.95 t/ha) and foliar top dressing of "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" in the amount of 4 l/ha (3 92 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Agris at 4 l/ha gave reported yield 3 92 t/ha.

Treatment
foliar top dressing of "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" in the amount of 4 l/hae0
Outcome
formation of the barley crope0
Direction
most favorablee0
Value
3 92 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most favorable factors for the formation of the barley crop were after application of mineral fertilizers in the amount of N60P60K60 (3.40–3.95 t/ha) and foliar top dressing of "Agris" brand "AzotKaliy" in the amount of 4 l/ha (3 92 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1652 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

application · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

application · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.