Abstract
In light of the scarcity of irrigation water, extreme wastage of water, saline soils, and the dominance of traditional water management methods, the presented research transpired in 2020 in the Directorate of Agriculture, ALHashimiya area, Hilla City, Iraq. The latest study aimed to investigate the effects of subsurface drip irrigation system (SDIS) and flood irrigation system (FIS), with three drip irrigation distances of 18, 20, and 22 cm on two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars, i.e., ‘Tarm Hashemi’ (TH) and ‘Daillman Mazandarani’ (DM). The irrigation systems (SDIS and FIS) significantly impacted the growth and productivity traits of the rice crop. The SDIS ensures the addition of an appropriate amount of water to the plants by keeping wet the root zone without wasting water compared with the flood irrigation system. The interaction of rice cultivar Tarm Hashemi, SDIS, and drip irrigation distance (DID of 18 cm) resulted in the best performance for root growth traits, i.e., root length and root fresh and dry weight (17.66 cm and 1.80 and 0.85 g, respectively). It also provided the highest plant vigor index (PVI), biological, and grain yield (71.15 cm, 1,747.23, and 608.26 g.m-2, respectively). Cultivar Tarm Hashemi proved superior to cultivar Daillman Mazandarani in managing the morpho-yield traits. The subsurface drip irrigation system during the growing season helped increase the productivity of the rice crop compared with the traditional irrigation system. Compared with FIS, the SDIS not only improved and enhanced the growth and grain yield, but also saved abundant water and nutrients.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation systems significantly affected rice growth and productivity.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- SDIS and FISe0
- Outcome
- growth and productivity traitse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation systems (SDIS and FIS) significantly impacted the growth and productivity traits of the rice crop”
Claim · model-written summary
SDIS kept the root zone wet without wasting water versus flood irrigation.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SDISe0
- Outcome
- wasting watere0
- Direction
- without wastinge0
- Comparator
- flood irrigation systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The SDIS ensures the addition of an appropriate amount of water to the plants by keeping wet the root zone without wasting water compared with the flood irrigation system”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
Tarm Hashemi under SDIS at 18 cm had root length of 17.66 cm.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Material
- Tarm Hashemie0
- Treatment
- SDISe0
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 17.66 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction of rice cultivar Tarm Hashemi, SDIS, and drip irrigation distance (DID of 18 cm) resulted in the best performance for root growth traits, i.e., root length and root fresh and dry weight (17.66 cm and 1.80 and 0.85 g, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip irrigation increased rice productivity versus traditional irrigation.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- subsurface drip irrigation systeme0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- traditional irrigation systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“subsurface drip irrigation system during the growing season helped increase the productivity of the rice crop compared with the traditional irrigation system”
Claim · model-written summary
SDIS improved rice growth and grain yield versus FIS.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SDISe0
- Outcome
- growth and grain yielde0
- Direction
- improved and enhancede0
- Comparator
- FISe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with FIS, the SDIS not only improved and enhanced the growth and grain yield, but also saved abundant water and nutrients”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
SDIS saved water and nutrients versus FIS.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with FIS, the SDIS not only improved and enhanced the growth and grain yield, but also saved abundant water and nutrients”
t0“RICE”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.