Paper · 2023 · SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics

PHENOLOGY, CROP STAND, AND DRY MATTER PRODUCTION OF WHEAT IN RESPONSE TO BENEFICIAL MICROBES AND ORGANIC MATTER SOURCES

S KHAN; A KHAN; T NADEEM; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Adding organic matter to soil proved an efficient strategy for restoring soil fertility and improving crop dry matter – an indicator of yield potential. In this regard, evaluating the sources of organic matter (OM) (control, poultry manure [PM], farmyard manure [FYM], compost, and mungbean residues [MR]) to provide 120 kg N ha-1 and effective microbes (EM) (0, 100, 200, and 300 L ton-1 of OM) as 2% solution proceeded in field conditions during 2017–2019. The sowing of wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015) at 120 kg ha-1 took place in the field using RCB design with four replications. Results showed that PM/FYM had delayed the phenology and improved the biomass-related parameters, dry matter (DM) accumulation, and crop growth rate (CGR) more than compost and MR. However, the results were more pronounced when applied with 300 L EM ton-1 of OM from the PM. The maximum DM (55%) accumulation in plant parts occurred beyond 100 days after sowing (DAS). A marked increase in DM and CGR beyond 60 DAS and a reduction in CGR beyond 120 DAS appeared irrespective of treatments. In the case of EM, the 300 L ton-1 revealed superior in terms of growth, DM accumulation, CGR, and delayed phenology. Structural equation modeling suggested that DM production gained a direct effect from crop phenology (46.1%) and crop stand (30.4%) but no indirect effect from crop growth (24.8%). In conclusion, the 300 L EM ton-1 of OM applied to PM or FYM had improved the crop stand, development, and DM production in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry and farmyard manure delayed wheat phenology more than compost and mungbean residues.

Material
cv. Pirsabak 2015e1
Treatment
PM/FYMe0
Outcome
phenologye0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
compost and MRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM/FYM had delayed the phenology and improved the biomass-related parameters, dry matter (DM) accumulation, and crop growth rate (CGR) more than compost and MR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry and farmyard manure improved wheat biomass parameters, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate more than compost and mungbean residues.

Treatment
PM/FYMe0
Outcome
biomass-related parameters, dry matter (DM) accumulation, and crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
compost and MRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM/FYM had delayed the phenology and improved the biomass-related parameters, dry matter (DM) accumulation, and crop growth rate (CGR) more than compost and MR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response to poultry manure was more pronounced with 300 L EM per ton of organic matter.

Treatment
300 L EM ton-1 of OM from the PMe0
Outcome
resultse0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results were more pronounced when applied with 300 L EM ton-1 of OM from the PM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum wheat dry matter accumulation was 55% beyond 100 days after sowing.

Outcome
accumulation in plant partse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
55%e0
Qualifier
beyond 100 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum DM (55%) accumulation in plant parts occurred beyond 100 days after sowing (DAS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–953 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat dry matter and crop growth rate increased beyond 60 days after sowing regardless of treatment.

Outcome
DM and CGRe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
beyond 60 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A marked increase in DM and CGR beyond 60 DAS and a reduction in CGR beyond 120 DAS appeared irrespective of treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat crop growth rate decreased beyond 120 days after sowing regardless of treatment.

Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
beyond 120 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A marked increase in DM and CGR beyond 60 DAS and a reduction in CGR beyond 120 DAS appeared irrespective of treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 L per ton effective microbe rate was superior for wheat growth, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate.

Treatment
300 L ton-1e0
Outcome
growth, DM accumulation, CGRe0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 300 L ton-1 revealed superior in terms of growth, DM accumulation, CGR, and delayed phenology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 L per ton effective microbe rate delayed wheat phenology.

Treatment
300 L ton-1e0
Outcome
phenologye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 300 L ton-1 revealed superior in terms of growth, DM accumulation, CGR, and delayed phenology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Structural equation modeling assigned wheat dry matter production a 46.1% direct effect from crop phenology.

Organ / stage
crop phenologye0
Outcome
DM productione0
Value
46.1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Structural equation modeling suggested that DM production gained a direct effect from crop phenology (46.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Structural equation modeling assigned wheat dry matter production a 30.4% direct effect from crop stand.

Outcome
DM productione0
Value
30.4%e0
Qualifier
crop stande0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DM production gained a direct effect from crop phenology (46.1%) and crop stand (30.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Structural equation modeling found no indirect effect from wheat crop growth on dry matter production.

Outcome
indirect effect from crop growthe0
Direction
no indirect effecte0
Value
24.8%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DM production gained a direct effect from crop phenology (46.1%) and crop stand (30.4%) but no indirect effect from crop growth (24.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seeds (cv. Pirsabak 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 300 L effective microbes per ton of organic matter with poultry or farmyard manure improved wheat crop stand, development and dry matter production.

Treatment
300 L EM ton-1 of OM applied to PM or FYMe0
Outcome
crop stand, development, and DM productione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 300 L EM ton-1 of OM applied to PM or FYM had improved the crop stand, development, and DM production in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1504 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 60 positive, 11 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.