Paper · 1975 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Land Application of Sewage Sludge: I. Effect on Growth and Chemical Composition of Plants

B. R. Sabey; W. E. Hart

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Municipal sewage sludge was added to a Truckton loamy sand at rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, and 125 metric tons/ha (dry weight basis) in the field to determine the effect on the growth and chemical composition of plants. Severe inhibition of germination of sorghum sudangrass ( Sorghum bicolor × S. sudanense ) cv. NB 280S, and millet ( Panicum miliacium L.) cv. Leonard, resulted when seeded shortly after the sludge was incorporated into the soil. Stand counts for wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell [ aestivum gray] cv. Centurk) seeded about 3 months after sludge incorporation snowed no germination inhibition. Either the inhibitory factor was dissipated or the wheat was more tolerant than the other plants. The decrease in sorghum sudangrass yields with sludge addition was a result of poor germination rather than growth inhibition due to the sewage sludge. With one exception, yields on sludge‐treated wheat plots were greater or equal to the no‐sludge plots. Based on wheat yields, the optimum application rate of the sludge used in this study was between 25 and 50 metric tons/ha. sludge application except for lead and phosphorus. In no case, even at 125 metric tons/ha was the elemental content of the wheat grain outside normal ranges excepted in plant tissues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge severely inhibited sorghum sudangrass germination shortly after incorporation.

Taxon
sorghum sudangrasse0
Material
NB 280Se0
Treatment
sludgee0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Severe inhibition of germination of sorghum sudangrass ( Sorghum bicolor × S. sudanense ) cv. NB 280S, and millet ( Panicum miliacium L.) cv. Leonard, resulted when seeded shortly after the sludge was incorporated into the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge severely inhibited millet germination shortly after incorporation.

Taxon
millete0
Material
Leonarde0
Treatment
sludgee0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Severe inhibition of germination of sorghum sudangrass ( Sorghum bicolor × S. sudanense ) cv. NB 280S, and millet ( Panicum miliacium L.) cv. Leonard, resulted when seeded shortly after the sludge was incorporated into the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seeded three months after incorporation had no germination inhibition.

Material
Centurke0
Treatment
sludge incorporatione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
no germination inhibitione0
Qualifier
about 3 months after sludge incorporatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stand counts for wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell [ aestivum gray] cv. Centurk) seeded about 3 months after sludge incorporation snowed no germination inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–622 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced sorghum sudangrass yields with sludge reflected poor germination.

Taxon
sorghum sudangrasse0
Treatment
sludge additione0
Outcome
decrease in sorghum sudangrass yieldse0
Qualifier
poor germinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in sorghum sudangrass yields with sludge addition was a result of poor germination rather than growth inhibition due to the sewage sludge.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yields on sludge plots were at least as high as no-sludge plots except once.

Treatment
sludge‐treatede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greater or equale0
Qualifier
With one exceptione0
Comparator
no‐sludge plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With one exception, yields on sludge‐treated wheat plots were greater or equal to the no‐sludge plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–975 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield indicated an optimum sludge rate of 25 to 50 metric tons per hectare.

Outcome
optimum application rate of the sludgee0
Value
between 25 and 50 metric tons/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on wheat yields, the optimum application rate of the sludge used in this study was between 25 and 50 metric tons/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain elemental content remained in normal ranges at up to 125 metric tons per hectare.

Outcome
elemental content of the wheat graine0
Value
125 metric tons/hae0
Qualifier
normal rangese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In no case, even at 125 metric tons/ha was the elemental content of the wheat grain outside normal ranges excepted in plant tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1282 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 60 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.