Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to observe the impact of Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) at various dosages along with standard chemicals against fungal foliar leaf spot (FFLS) at Department of Plant Pathology, Ludhiana for two years. Of the tested fungicides, Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) exhibited significant per cent disease control (PDC) of 57.33 % and 61.1 % @ 0.5 ml/l of water over control treatment during year 2020 and 2021, respectively. Highest seed cotton yield of 23.90 and 22.27 quintal per acre was obtained with Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) @ 0.5 ml/ litre of water. The standard check Amistar Top 325 EC showed maximum PDC (58.20 and 63.09 %) @ 1ml/l of water during both cropping seasons, respectively. Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) did not show any phytotoxicity on the cotton crop in both the years, respectively. Therefore based on the observation of two years, Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) effectively managed the malady under field condition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Priaxor at 0.5 ml/l gave significant 57.33 % disease control in 2020 versus control.
Verbatim
e0“Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) exhibited significant per cent disease control (PDC) of 57.33 % and 61.1 % @ 0.5 ml/l of water over control treatment during year 2020 and 2021, respectively.”
t0“upland cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Priaxor at 0.5 ml/l gave significant 61.1 % disease control in 2021 versus control.
Verbatim
e0“Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) exhibited significant per cent disease control (PDC) of 57.33 % and 61.1 % @ 0.5 ml/l of water over control treatment during year 2020 and 2021, respectively.”
t0“upland cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Priaxor at 0.5 ml/l gave the highest seed cotton yield, 23.90 quintal per acre, in 2020.
- Taxon
- upland cottont0
- Treatment
- Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) @ 0.5 ml/ litre of watere0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 23.90 and 22.27 quintal per acree0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Highest seed cotton yield of 23.90 and 22.27 quintal per acre was obtained with Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) @ 0.5 ml/ litre of water.”
t0“upland cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Amistar Top 325 EC gave maximum disease control of 58.20 % in the first season.
- Taxon
- upland cottont0
- Treatment
- Amistar Top 325 ECe0
- Outcome
- PDCe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 58.20 and 63.09 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The standard check Amistar Top 325 EC showed maximum PDC (58.20 and 63.09 %) @ 1ml/l of water during both cropping seasons, respectively.”
t0“upland cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Priaxor showed no phytotoxicity on cotton in either year.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC)e0
- Outcome
- phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- did not showe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Priaxor (fluxapyroxad 167 g/l + pyraclostrobin 333 g/l SC) did not show any phytotoxicity on the cotton crop in both the years, respectively.”
t0“upland cotton”
The same questions in other papers
pyraclostrobin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fluxapyroxad · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.