Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Effect of Fungicide Application in Combination with Different Growth Regulators on Cotton Boll Quality and Yield in the Northwest Inland of China

Munire Abuduaini; Hao Cheng; Xinghu Song; et al.

12
claims
38
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators. A field experiment was conducted in Xiaya, Xinjiang, from 2021 to 2023. The primary treatment involved a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulators: 14-hydroxylated brassinosteroid (150 mL/ha, M1), 0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2), or 8% diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate (150 g/ha, M3). Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment. This study examined the interaction between year and treatment and analyzed key factors affecting cotton yield. The results indicated a significant interaction effect between chemical treatments and yield across the years. All treatments led to an increase in yield compared with the control, with notable improvements in the number of bolls per unit area, boll weight, leaf area index, and net photosynthesis rate of cotton leaves. From a spatial perspective, the treatments effectively enhanced the number of bolls in the upper part of the plant. A positive correlation was observed between the number of new bolls and seed cotton yield. Among the treatments, the M2 treatment proved to be the most effective, which substantially increased the number of bolls in the upper part of the plant, as well as the total number of bolls per unit area and boll weight, resulting in a significant yield improvement. These findings can guide the development of chemical regulation strategies for cotton production in the Aksu region of Xinjiang, China, providing a valuable reference for enhancing local cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin combined with growth regulators increased cotton yield compared with the control.

Treatment
a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulatorse1
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
Clear water (M0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–496 · show in text ↑
e3

“All treatments led to an increase in yield compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased the number of bolls per unit area and boll weight compared with the control.

Treatment
a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulatorse1
Outcome
number of bolls per unit area, boll weighte4
Direction
improvementse4
Comparator
Clear water (M0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–496 · show in text ↑
e4

“with notable improvements in the number of bolls per unit area, boll weight, leaf area index, and net photosynthesis rate of cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments improved leaf area index of cotton compared with the control.

Treatment
a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulatorse1
Outcome
leaf area indexe4
Direction
improvementse4
Comparator
Clear water (M0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–496 · show in text ↑
e4

“with notable improvements in the number of bolls per unit area, boll weight, leaf area index, and net photosynthesis rate of cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments improved net photosynthesis rate of cotton leaves compared with the control.

Treatment
a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulatorse1
Outcome
net photosynthesis rate of cotton leavese4
Direction
improvementse4
Comparator
Clear water (M0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–496 · show in text ↑
e4

“with notable improvements in the number of bolls per unit area, boll weight, leaf area index, and net photosynthesis rate of cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments enhanced the number of bolls in the upper part of the cotton plant.

Treatment
a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulatorse1
Outcome
number of bolls in the upper part of the plante5
Direction
enhancede5
Comparator
Clear water (M0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 40% pyraclostrobin suspension (300 mL/ha) combined with different growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–496 · show in text ↑
e5

“From a spatial perspective, the treatments effectively enhanced the number of bolls in the upper part of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1045 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of new bolls was positively correlated with seed cotton yield.

Organ / stage
new bollse6
Outcome
seed cotton yielde6
Direction
positivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“A positive correlation was observed between the number of new bolls and seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the treatments, 0.1% thidiazuron (M2) was the most effective.

Treatment
0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)e1
Outcome
most effectivee7
Direction
most effectivee7
Comparator
the treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–393 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among the treatments, the M2 treatment proved to be the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 substantially increased the number of bolls in the upper part of the cotton plant.

Treatment
0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)e1
Outcome
number of bolls in the upper part of the plante3
Direction
substantially increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“which substantially increased the number of bolls in the upper part of the plant, as well as the total number of bolls per unit area and boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 increased the total number of bolls per unit area and boll weight of cotton.

Treatment
0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)e1
Outcome
total number of bolls per unit area and boll weighte3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“which substantially increased the number of bolls in the upper part of the plant, as well as the total number of bolls per unit area and boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 treatment gave a significant cotton yield improvement compared with the control.

Treatment
0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)e1
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
improvemente4
Comparator
Clear water (M0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.1% thidiazuron (150 mL/ha, M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–393 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clear water (M0) was used as the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–496 · show in text ↑
e4

“resulting in a significant yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1404 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between chemical treatments and yield across years was significant.

Treatment
chemical treatmentse5
Outcome
yielde5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield can be stabilized by regulating the number and weight of bolls through the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated a significant interaction effect between chemical treatments and yield across the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–719 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The findings can guide chemical regulation strategies for cotton production in the Aksu region.

Outcome
chemical regulation strategies for cotton productione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“These findings can guide the development of chemical regulation strategies for cotton production in the Aksu region of Xinjiang, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1540 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pyraclostrobin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Thidiazuron · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

class · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

class · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

class · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.