Paper · 2023 · BADEGGI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRONMENT

Evaluation of growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp) cultivars and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) with their competitive behavior in cowpea-sorghum intercropping.

A. I. Afe; K. Nuruden; U. Yaman

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The need to increase cowpea production to solve the menace of malnutrition is a global challenge and land limitations have also made intercropping indispensable. Field trials were carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm, Kwara State University, Malete, and National Centre for Agricultural Mechanization (NCAM) Idofian to evaluate the growth and yield of cowpea cultivars and sorghum with their competitive behavior in cowpea-sorghum intercropping. Five cultivars of cowpea (IITA-256, IITA-277, VITAL-5, IT98K-491-4, and IITA-288) were intercropped with sorghum. Sole crops were included in the treatments as a check. The treatments were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design and replicated three times. Among the sole, vital-5 cultivar had the highest number of branches and pods per plant and more seeds per pod compared to other cultivars. The cultivar also recorded the highest grain yield 591.30 kg/ha and 530.00 kg/ha respectively, for Malete and NCAM at the sole. At the intercrop, IITA-288 significantly had the least number of branches per plant and took longer days to attain flowering compared to other cultivars. The lowest grain yield at the intercrop was also obtained with this cultivar. Sorghum intercropped with cowpea cultivar IITA-288 was at par with the sole sorghum in all the parameters. The least grain yield of sorghum at the intercrop was obtained in sorghum intercropping with IITA-256 cowpea cultivar. The maximum Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), and Land Equivalent Coefficient (LEC), was obtained with the Vital-5 cultivar. Regardless of location, the competitive ratio (CR) values for IITA-256, IITA-277, and Vital-5 cowpea cultivars were higher than sorghum. The aggressivisity, (A) for these cultivars were also positive for cowpea and negative for sorghum. Although, all the cowpea cultivars demonstrated intercropping advantages in efficient utilization of natural resources intercropping with the Vital-5 cowpea cultivar was superior and could be adopted by the farmer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-grown vital-5 had the highest branch and pod numbers and more seeds per pod.

Material
vital-5e0
Outcome
number of branches and pods per plant and more seeds per pode0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the sole, vital-5 cultivar had the highest number of branches and pods per plant and more seeds per pod compared to other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-grown vital-5 yielded 591.30 kg/ha at Malete.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
591.30 kg/hae0
Setting
Maletee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar also recorded the highest grain yield 591.30 kg/ha and 530.00 kg/ha respectively, for Malete and NCAM at the sole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-grown vital-5 yielded 530.00 kg/ha at NCAM.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
530.00 kg/hae0
Setting
NCAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar also recorded the highest grain yield 591.30 kg/ha and 530.00 kg/ha respectively, for Malete and NCAM at the sole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped IITA-288 had significantly the fewest branches per plant.

Material
IITA-288e0
Outcome
number of branches per plante0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the intercrop, IITA-288 significantly had the least number of branches per plant and took longer days to attain flowering compared to other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped IITA-288 took longer to flower than other cultivars.

Material
IITA-288e0
Outcome
days to attain floweringe0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the intercrop, IITA-288 significantly had the least number of branches per plant and took longer days to attain flowering compared to other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This cultivar gave the lowest grain yield in intercrop.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest grain yield at the intercrop was also obtained with this cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum with IITA-288 cowpea was at par with sole sorghum across parameters.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropped with cowpea cultivar IITA-288e0
Outcome
all the parameterse0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
sole sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum intercropped with cowpea cultivar IITA-288 was at par with the sole sorghum in all the parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum with IITA-256 cowpea had the least intercrop grain yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
sorghum intercropping with IITA-256 cowpea cultivare0
Outcome
grain yield of sorghume0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The least grain yield of sorghum at the intercrop was obtained in sorghum intercropping with IITA-256 cowpea cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1443 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vital-5 produced the maximum LER and LEC.

Material
Vital-5 cultivare0
Outcome
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), and Land Equivalent Coefficient (LEC)e0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), and Land Equivalent Coefficient (LEC), was obtained with the Vital-5 cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IITA-256, IITA-277 and Vital-5 cowpea had higher competitive ratios than sorghum.

Outcome
competitive ratio (CR) valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of location, the competitive ratio (CR) values for IITA-256, IITA-277, and Vital-5 cowpea cultivars were higher than sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1700 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressivity was positive for cowpea cultivars.

Outcome
aggressivisitye0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aggressivisity, (A) for these cultivars were also positive for cowpea and negative for sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressivity was negative for sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
aggressivisitye0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aggressivisity, (A) for these cultivars were also positive for cowpea and negative for sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cowpea cultivars showed intercropping advantages in resource use.

Outcome
intercropping advantages in efficient utilization of natural resourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although, all the cowpea cultivars demonstrated intercropping advantages in efficient utilization of natural resources intercropping with the Vital-5 cowpea cultivar was superior and could be adopted by the farmer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–2015 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Vital-5 cowpea for intercropping.

Outcome
intercropping with the Vital-5 cowpea cultivar was superior and could be adopted by the farmere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although, all the cowpea cultivars demonstrated intercropping advantages in efficient utilization of natural resources intercropping with the Vital-5 cowpea cultivar was superior and could be adopted by the farmer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–2015 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

49 papers: 40 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.