Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping gave yield advantages across a wide range of environmental conditions.

A claim from Evaluation of Yield Stability in Intercropping: Studies on Sorghum/Pigeonpea · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave yield advantages across a wide range of environmental conditions.

Taxon
sorghum/pigeonpeaCajanus cajanSorghume1
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
yield advantagese0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
under a wide range of environmental conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping gave yield advantages under a wide range of environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–866
e1

“sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–67

Title

Evaluation of Yield Stability in Intercropping: Studies on Sorghum/Pigeonpea

M. R. Rao; R. W. Willey Experimental Agriculture 1980. doi:10.1017/s0014479700010796

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-844bf3a8a1b937d26c210f4f807ea86f4c78b423715c5fcda39c123585d42f0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.