Abstract
There is large number of sulphur(S) sources available in the country and their efficiency need to be evaluated. In view of the meager information available on sulphur nutrition in a popular intercropping system of pigeonpea + groundnut. A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2003 and 2004 to evaluate the response of pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] + groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) intercropping system to FYM and S fertilization. Ap- plication of FYM at 5.0 t/ha significantly increased the yield and yield attributes, nutrient (NPK) uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity (1.71 t/ha), net returns (Rs 18,287) and available S in soil after har- vest (15.72 kg/ha). However, B: C ratio was higher with crop receiving no FYM. Intercropping failed to influence the yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea, however, system productivity, net income and B: C ra- tio was higher in pigeonpea + groundnut system. The available soil S after harvest of crop(s) was lower in pigeonpea + groundnut system (13.11 kg/ha) when compared with sole pigeonpea (17.06 kg/ha). Application of sulphur at 35 and 70 kg/ ha, being on par, recorded significant increase in yield and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity and total net income over no S. The available soil S after harvest of crop (s) was higher with 70 kg S/ha. The S use efficiency indices were higher at lower i.e. 35 kg S/ha. Among the sources of sulphur, cosavet recorded higher yield and yield attributes, nutrient uptake and S use efficiency. However, the highest soil available S at harvest (19.34 kg/ha) was recorded with elemental S applied at 70 kg/ ha, while the highest net income (Rs 20,431) and B: C ratio (2.0) were achieved with gypsum at 35 kg S/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
FYM increased yield and yield attributes in pigeonpea and groundnut.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- FYM at 5.0 t/hae0
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ap- plication of FYM at 5.0 t/ha significantly increased the yield and yield attributes, nutrient (NPK) uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity (1.71 t/ha), net returns (Rs 18,287) and available S in soil after har- vest (15.72 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM increased NPK uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- FYM at 5.0 t/hae0
- Outcome
- nutrient (NPK) uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ap- plication of FYM at 5.0 t/ha significantly increased the yield and yield attributes, nutrient (NPK) uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity (1.71 t/ha), net returns (Rs 18,287) and available S in soil after har- vest (15.72 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM increased system productivity to 1.71 t/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- FYM at 5.0 t/hae0
- Outcome
- system productivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1.71 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ap- plication of FYM at 5.0 t/ha significantly increased the yield and yield attributes, nutrient (NPK) uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity (1.71 t/ha), net returns (Rs 18,287) and available S in soil after har- vest (15.72 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM increased net returns to Rs 18,287.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- FYM at 5.0 t/hae0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- Rs 18,287e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ap- plication of FYM at 5.0 t/ha significantly increased the yield and yield attributes, nutrient (NPK) uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity (1.71 t/ha), net returns (Rs 18,287) and available S in soil after har- vest (15.72 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM increased postharvest soil sulfur to 15.72 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- FYM at 5.0 t/hae0
- Outcome
- available S in soil after har- veste0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15.72 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ap- plication of FYM at 5.0 t/ha significantly increased the yield and yield attributes, nutrient (NPK) uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity (1.71 t/ha), net returns (Rs 18,287) and available S in soil after har- vest (15.72 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit-cost ratio was higher without FYM.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“B: C ratio was higher with crop receiving no FYM.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not influence pigeonpea yield, yield attributes or nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- Intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- failed to influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping failed to influence the yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea-groundnut intercropping raised system productivity, net income and benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea + groundnute0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + groundnut systeme0
- Outcome
- system productivity, net income and B: C ra- tioe0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“system productivity, net income and B: C ra- tio was higher in pigeonpea + groundnut system.”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest soil sulfur was lower under intercropping than sole pigeonpea.
Verbatim
e0“The available soil S after harvest of crop(s) was lower in pigeonpea + groundnut system (13.11 kg/ha) when compared with sole pigeonpea (17.06 kg/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur at 35 and 70 kg/ha increased crop yields and nutrient uptake over no sulfur.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- sulphur at 35 and 70 kg/ hae0
- Outcome
- yield and nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- no Se0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of sulphur at 35 and 70 kg/ ha, being on par, recorded significant increase in yield and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity and total net income over no S.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur at 35 and 70 kg/ha increased system productivity and net income over no sulfur.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- sulphur at 35 and 70 kg/ hae0
- Outcome
- system productivity and total net incomee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- no Se0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of sulphur at 35 and 70 kg/ ha, being on par, recorded significant increase in yield and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea and groundnut, system productivity and total net income over no S.”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest soil sulfur was higher with 70 kg S/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 70 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- available soil S after harveste0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The available soil S after harvest of crop (s) was higher with 70 kg S/ha.”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur use efficiency was higher at 35 kg S/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 35 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- S use efficiency indicese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The S use efficiency indices were higher at lower i.e. 35 kg S/ha.”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cosavet produced higher yield, yield attributes, nutrient uptake and sulfur use efficiency than other sulfur sources.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- cosavete0
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributes, nutrient uptake and S use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sources of sulphure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the sources of sulphur, cosavet recorded higher yield and yield attributes, nutrient uptake and S use efficiency.”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Elemental sulfur at 70 kg/ha gave the highest available soil sulfur, 19.34 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- elemental S applied at 70 kg/ hae0
- Outcome
- soil available S at harveste0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 19.34 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest soil available S at harvest (19.34 kg/ha) was recorded with elemental S applied at 70 kg/ ha”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum at 35 kg S/ha gave the highest net income, Rs 20,431.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- gypsum at 35 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- net incomee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs 20,431e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest net income (Rs 20,431) and B: C ratio (2.0) were achieved with gypsum at 35 kg S/ha.”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum at 35 kg S/ha gave the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.0.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- gypsum at 35 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest net income (Rs 20,431) and B: C ratio (2.0) were achieved with gypsum at 35 kg S/ha.”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
58 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →lime · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.