fertilization · Nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)
62 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 34
Effects of N, P, Liming, and Mo on Nutrition and Grain Yield of Pigeon Pea1 · 1977
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Relative efficiency of sources of P and Bioregulators on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) · 2010
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Response of pigeonpea to organic and inorganic fertilization · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea-based intercropping systems · 2018
- positive
- positive
Effect of potassium and zinc application on macro nutrient uptake of red gram under Vertisols · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of potassium and sulphur on forms of potassium, under pigeonpea grown in vertisols · 2019
- positive
Response of potassium and micronutrients on nutrient uptake and economics of pigeon pea · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
fertilization on Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea) against other targets
fertilization · nutrient: content on other organisms
- Urochloa brizantha (palisade grass)
- Zea mays (maize)
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Glycine max (soybean)
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
- Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
- Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)
- Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
- Solanum tuberosum (potato)
- Hordeum vulgare (barley)