Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at Millet Breeding Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2015 and 2016 with the objective of Dry matter, Nutrient uptake and yield of short duration Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) varieties under Drip fertigation system. The experiment was laid out in strip plot design with three replications. The main plot treatments were allotted with three varieties viz., Co (Rg) 7, APK 1 and VBN 3. The sub plot treatments comprised of three drip fertigation levels viz., 75 %, 100 % and 125 % RDF (@ 25:50:25 kg NPK ha-1) through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of PPFM and drip fertigation at 100% RDF through WSF alone along with surface irrigation with conventional fertilizers. The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016). The grain yield 1992 and 1758 kg ha-1were significantly observed under drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFM. Among the pigeonpea varieties, Co (Rg)7 performed well compared to APK 1 and VBN 3 varieties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
The highest N uptake in kharif 2015 was 187.32 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- drip fertigation and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 187.32e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest P uptake in kharif 2015 was 17.04 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 17.04e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest K uptake in kharif 2015 was 107.4 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 107.4e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest N uptake in summer 2016 was 165.85 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 165.85e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest P uptake in summer 2016 was 15.9 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 15.9e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest K uptake in summer 2016 was 95.40 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation and soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 95.40e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter production was 7042 kg ha-1 in kharif 2015.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- dry matter productione0
- Value
- 7042e0
- Qualifier
- kharif 2015e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter production was 6235 kg ha-1 in summer 2016.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- dry matter productione0
- Value
- 6235 kg ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- summer 2016e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of varieties and nutrient application methods (drip fertigation and soil application) the highest NPK uptake during kharif 2015 and summer 2016 (187.32, 17.04, 107.4 and 165.85, 15.9, 95.40 kg ha-1) dry matter production of (7042 and 6235 kg ha-1 during kharif 2015 and summer 2016).”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 125% RDF fertigation treatment produced 1992 kg ha-1 grain yield.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFMe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 1992e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield 1992 and 1758 kg ha-1were significantly observed under drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFM.”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 125% RDF fertigation treatment produced 1758 kg ha-1 grain yield.
- Taxon
- Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFMe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 1758 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield 1992 and 1758 kg ha-1were significantly observed under drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFM.”
t0“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Co (Rg)7 performed better than APK 1 and VBN 3.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Co (Rg)7e0
- Outcome
- performed welle0
- Direction
- welle0
- Comparator
- APK 1 and VBN 3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the pigeonpea varieties, Co (Rg)7 performed well compared to APK 1 and VBN 3 varieties.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
50 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.