Abstract
The field experiment included nine treatment combinations with two fertilizer levels to intercrop as main plot (F1 - 50 % and F2 - 100 % RDF to intercrop) and four N:P ratios to pigeonpea as sub plots [L1 – 1:2 (25:50 kg N:P2O5 ha-1), L2 – 1:2.5 (25:62.5 kg N:P2O5 ha-1), L3 – 1:3 (25:75 kg N:P2O5 ha-1) and L4 – 1:3.5 (25:87.5 kg N:P2O5 ha-1)] and one absolute control (without any fertilizer application to both the crops). Non- significant difference was noticed in nutrient status of soil with respect to different fertilizer levels to intercrop. Among the N:P ratios to pigeonpea, 1:3, 1:3.5 recorded significantly higher available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon (239.72, 241.60 and 45.35, 47.50 kg ha-1 and 0.49, 0.50 %, respectively). Among the interactions, available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon in soil was found significantly higher with 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5 (243.20, 49.14 kg ha-1 and 0.52 %, respectively). Agronomic efficiency was found significantly higher with 50 and 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3 and 1:3.5 (7.50,7.57 and 7.93, 7.63, respectively) of the system. Among the interactions, F2L3, F2L4 showed significantly higher PEY, gross and net returns (2537, 2597 kg ha-1, 1,43,971, 1,47,390 ha-1, and 1,02,771, 1,05,566 ha-1, respectively) over others except F1L3, F1L4 and indicated that 50% RDF was enough to intercrop when main crop was supplied with 75 and 100 kg P2O5.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea N:P ratios 1:3 and 1:3.5 gave significantly higher available nitrogen in soil.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- N:P ratios to pigeonpeae1
- Outcome
- available nitrogene1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 239.72, 241.60e1
- Qualifier
- 1:3, 1:3.5e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Among the N:P ratios to pigeonpea, 1:3, 1:3.5 recorded significantly higher available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon (239.72, 241.60 and 45.35, 47.50 kg ha-1 and 0.49, 0.50 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea N:P ratios 1:3 and 1:3.5 gave significantly higher available phosphorus in soil.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- N:P ratios to pigeonpeae1
- Outcome
- phosphoruse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 45.35, 47.50 kg ha-1e1
- Qualifier
- 1:3, 1:3.5e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Among the N:P ratios to pigeonpea, 1:3, 1:3.5 recorded significantly higher available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon (239.72, 241.60 and 45.35, 47.50 kg ha-1 and 0.49, 0.50 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea N:P ratios 1:3 and 1:3.5 gave significantly higher soil organic carbon.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- N:P ratios to pigeonpeae1
- Outcome
- organic carbone1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 0.49, 0.50 %e1
- Qualifier
- 1:3, 1:3.5e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Among the N:P ratios to pigeonpea, 1:3, 1:3.5 recorded significantly higher available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon (239.72, 241.60 and 45.35, 47.50 kg ha-1 and 0.49, 0.50 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio 1:3.5 interaction gave significantly higher available nitrogen in soil.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5e2
- Outcome
- available nitrogene2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 243.20e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e2“Among the interactions, available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon in soil was found significantly higher with 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5 (243.20, 49.14 kg ha-1 and 0.52 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio 1:3.5 interaction gave significantly higher soil phosphorus.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5e2
- Outcome
- phosphoruse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 49.14 kg ha-1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e2“Among the interactions, available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon in soil was found significantly higher with 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5 (243.20, 49.14 kg ha-1 and 0.52 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio 1:3.5 interaction gave significantly higher soil organic carbon.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5e2
- Outcome
- organic carbone2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 0.52 %e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e2“Among the interactions, available nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon in soil was found significantly higher with 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3.5 (243.20, 49.14 kg ha-1 and 0.52 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Agronomic efficiency was significantly higher with 50 and 100 % RDF to intercrop combined with N:P ratios 1:3 and 1:3.5.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 50 and 100 % RDF to intercrope3
- Outcome
- Agronomic efficiencye3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 7.50,7.57 and 7.93, 7.63e3
- Qualifier
- N:P ratio of 1:3 and 1:3.5e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e3“Agronomic efficiency was found significantly higher with 50 and 100 % RDF to intercrop with N:P ratio of 1:3 and 1:3.5 (7.50,7.57 and 7.93, 7.63, respectively) of the system”
Claim · model-written summary
F2L3 and F2L4 gave significantly higher PEY than the other treatments, except F1L3 and F1L4.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- F2L3, F2L4e4
- Outcome
- PEYe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 2537, 2597 kg ha-1e4
- Qualifier
- except F1L3, F1L4e4
- Comparator
- otherse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e4“F2L3, F2L4 showed significantly higher PEY, gross and net returns (2537, 2597 kg ha-1, 1,43,971, 1,47,390 ha-1, and 1,02,771, 1,05,566 ha-1, respectively) over others except F1L3, F1L4”
Claim · model-written summary
F2L3 and F2L4 gave significantly higher gross returns than the other treatments (1,43,971 and 1,47,390 ha-1).
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- F2L3, F2L4e4
- Outcome
- gross and net returnse4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 1,43,971, 1,47,390 ha-1e4
- Comparator
- otherse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e4“F2L3, F2L4 showed significantly higher PEY, gross and net returns (2537, 2597 kg ha-1, 1,43,971, 1,47,390 ha-1, and 1,02,771, 1,05,566 ha-1, respectively) over others except F1L3, F1L4”
Claim · model-written summary
F2L3 and F2L4 gave significantly higher net returns than the other treatments (1,02,771 and 1,05,566 ha-1).
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- F2L3, F2L4e4
- Outcome
- gross and net returnse4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 1,02,771, 1,05,566 ha-1e4
- Comparator
- otherse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e4“F2L3, F2L4 showed significantly higher PEY, gross and net returns (2537, 2597 kg ha-1, 1,43,971, 1,47,390 ha-1, and 1,02,771, 1,05,566 ha-1, respectively) over others except F1L3, F1L4”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend that 50% RDF is enough to intercrop when the main crop receives 75 and 100 kg P2O5.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 75 and 100 kg P2O5e5
- Outcome
- 50% RDF was enough to intercrope5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e5“indicated that 50% RDF was enough to intercrop when main crop was supplied with 75 and 100 kg P2O5”
Claim · model-written summary
Different fertilizer levels to the intercrop did not significantly change soil nutrient status.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- different fertilizer levels to intercrope6
- Outcome
- nutrient status of soile6
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea + Blackgram System”
e6“Non- significant difference was noticed in nutrient status of soil with respect to different fertilizer levels to intercrop”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →intercropping · nutrient: efficiency · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.