Paper · 2018 · Agricultural Research

Impact of Establishment Techniques and Maturity Duration of Pigeon Pea Cultivars on Yield, Water Productivity and Properties of Soil

Y. P. Singh; Sudhir Singh; Prabhakar Nanda; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

India is the leading country with respect to area and production of pulse crop pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). However, the productivity of this crop is too low and almost static for the last five decades due to cultivation of long-duration cultivars that are prone to climatic variations causing temporary water logging, drought and frost. Proper selection of the cultivar and use of appropriate crop establishment may help in enhancing productivity. Therefore, a field investigation was carried out for 3 consecutive years to determine the impact of establishment techniques on cultivars of two maturity durations—long (250–280 days; cv. JA-4) and short (130–145 days; cv. ICPL-88039), grown using the conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), zero tillage (ZT) and broad bed furrow (BBF). The BBF method significantly improved the growth, biological yield, harvest index ratio, water productivity and physicochemical properties compared to the CT, MT and ZT. The yield of pigeon pea seed and stalk under the BBF increased 9.9 and 4.1% compared to the CT. The short-duration cultivar produced higher yield (16.8%) in frost-affected year (2012–2013) but was at par with the long-duration cultivar during the normal climatic condition year (2013–2015). Overall, the short-duration cultivar produced significantly higher yield. Land use efficiency and total water use were significantly higher for the long-duration cultivar a compared to the short-duration cultivar, whereas production efficiency and water productivity were higher for the short-duration cultivar. Compared to the other tillage practices, BBF showed significantly higher organic carbon and infiltration rate but decreased pH. The trend of infiltration rate was in the order BBF > ZT > MT > CT. The bulk density of surface (0–15 cm) and sub-surface (15–30 cm) layers were significantly lower under the BBF compared to the other tillage practices. Maximum increment of available N, P, K and S in surface soil (0–15 cm) was recorded under the BBF. For the short-duration maturity cultivar of pigeon pea the BBF method appeared beneficial in terms of assured higher yield, improved water productivity and physicochemical properties of soil under variable climatic conditions in Central India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF significantly improved growth, biological yield and harvest index ratio of pigeon pea relative to CT, MT and ZT.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBF methode1
Outcome
growth, biological yield, harvest index ratioe1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
CT, MT and ZTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The BBF method significantly improved the growth, biological yield, harvest index ratio, water productivity and physicochemical properties compared to the CT, MT and ZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF significantly improved water productivity of pigeon pea relative to CT, MT and ZT.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBF methode1
Outcome
water productivitye1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
CT, MT and ZTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The BBF method significantly improved the growth, biological yield, harvest index ratio, water productivity and physicochemical properties compared to the CT, MT and ZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF significantly improved physicochemical properties of the soil relative to CT, MT and ZT.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBF methode1
Outcome
physicochemical propertiese1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
CT, MT and ZTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The BBF method significantly improved the growth, biological yield, harvest index ratio, water productivity and physicochemical properties compared to the CT, MT and ZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under BBF, pigeon pea seed yield increased by 9.9% compared with CT.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe2
Outcome
yield of pigeon pea seede2
Direction
increasede2
Value
9.9e2
Comparator
CTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The yield of pigeon pea seed and stalk under the BBF increased 9.9 and 4.1% compared to the CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under BBF, pigeon pea stalk yield increased by 4.1% compared with CT.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe2
Outcome
stalke2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.1%e2
Qualifier
yield of pigeon pea seed and stalke2
Comparator
CTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The yield of pigeon pea seed and stalk under the BBF increased 9.9 and 4.1% compared to the CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The short-duration cultivar produced higher yield (16.8%) in the frost-affected year (2012-2013).

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Material
short-duration cultivare3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
16.8%e3
Setting
frost-affected year (2012–2013)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The short-duration cultivar produced higher yield (16.8%) in frost-affected year (2012–2013)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the normal climatic year (2013-2015) the short-duration cultivar was at par in yield with the long-duration cultivar.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Material
short-duration cultivare4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
long-duration cultivare4
Setting
normal climatic condition year (2013–2015)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The short-duration cultivar produced higher yield (16.8%) in frost-affected year (2012–2013) but was at par with the long-duration cultivar during the normal climatic condition year (2013–2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The short-duration cultivar produced significantly higher yield overall.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Material
short-duration cultivare5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
highere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Overall, the short-duration cultivar produced significantly higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Land use efficiency and total water use were significantly higher for the long-duration cultivar than for the short-duration cultivar.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Material
long-duration cultivare6
Outcome
Land use efficiency and total water usee6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
short-duration cultivare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Land use efficiency and total water use were significantly higher for the long-duration cultivar a compared to the short-duration cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production efficiency and water productivity were higher for the short-duration cultivar.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Material
short-duration cultivare7
Outcome
production efficiency and water productivitye7
Direction
highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“whereas production efficiency and water productivity were higher for the short-duration cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF showed significantly higher organic carbon and infiltration rate than the other tillage practices.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe0
Outcome
organic carbon and infiltration ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the other tillage practices, BBF showed significantly higher organic carbon and infiltration rate but decreased pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF decreased soil pH compared with the other tillage practices.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the other tillage practices, BBF showed significantly higher organic carbon and infiltration rate but decreased pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF significantly lowered bulk density of the surface and sub-surface layers compared with the other tillage practices.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe1
Outcome
bulk density of surface (0–15 cm) and sub-surface (15–30 cm) layerse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
other tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The bulk density of surface (0–15 cm) and sub-surface (15–30 cm) layers were significantly lower under the BBF compared to the other tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF increased the maximum available N, P and K in surface soil.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe2
Outcome
available N, P, Ke2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum increment of available N, P, K and S in surface soil (0–15 cm) was recorded under the BBF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF increased the maximum available S in surface soil.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
BBFe2
Outcome
Se2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
available N, P, K and Se2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum increment of available N, P, K and S in surface soil (0–15 cm) was recorded under the BBF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The BBF method appears beneficial for the short-duration pigeon pea cultivar under variable climate in Central India.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane3
Material
short-duration maturity cultivare3
Treatment
BBF methode3
Outcome
appeared beneficiale3
Setting
Central Indiae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“For the short-duration maturity cultivar of pigeon pea the BBF method appeared beneficial in terms of assured higher yield, improved water productivity and physicochemical properties of soil under variable climatic conditions in Central India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2018–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    FIRBS increased pigeonpea grain yield by 22%.

    A.S. DHINDWAL1, I.S. HOODA, R.K. MALlK AND S. KUMAR · 2001 · compared with flat-sown crops

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.