Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 125% RDF fertigation treatment produced 1758 kg ha-1 grain yield.

A claim from Dry matter, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Short Duration Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) Varieties under Drip Fertigation system · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% RDF fertigation treatment produced 1758 kg ha-1 grain yield.

Taxon
Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)Cajanus cajant0
Treatment
drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
1758 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield 1992 and 1758 kg ha-1were significantly observed under drip fertigation with125% RDF through WSF with Azophosmet and foliar spray of 1% PPFM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1185
t0

“Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85

Title

Dry matter, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Short Duration Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) Varieties under Drip Fertigation system

R. Jeyajothi; S. Pazhanivelan International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.462

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c14232a355aa81ca99bf5b625af05f33ed31db05ada2e0229460e90a1f322a5f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.