Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Response of long duration pigeonpea (Cajanus Cajan L .) to foliar application of nutrients and insecticides under rainfed condition of Bihar

IB Pandey; RS Singh; Sunil Kumar; et al.

14
claims
48
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for three consecutive years during Kharif seasons of 2016-17 to 2018-19 at Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi a campus of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur to study the response of long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp] to foliar application of nutrients and insecticides under rainfed condition. Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant, pod length (5.6 cm), number of grains/pod (212), fruiting efficiency (16.8%) water-use-efficiency (3.5 kg/ha/mm), production efficiency in term of ₹/ha/day (366.7) and kg/ha/day (8.61), grain yield (2286.5 kg/ha), and NPK-uptake by crop and net return (96.83x103₹/ha) but was found at par with foliar application of 1% urea+ 0.25% borax and ZnSO4 at 50% flowering together with basal application of RDF and significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone. However, significantly higher B:C ratio (3.15) was registered under foliar application of 1% urea + 0.25% borax and ZnSO4 together with RDF. Foliar application of indoxacarb 1ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later with RDF and foliar application of these insecticides with multi-micronutrient at 50% flowering with RDF significantly reduced the incidence of pod borer and pod fly than other treatments. Plant height, branches/ plant, 100-grain weight, and protein content in grain were unaffected by foliar application of nutrients and insecticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar multi-micronutrient with indoxacarb and profenofos plus RDF increased the number of pods per plant of pigeonpea compared with RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
number of pods/plante2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod length of pigeonpea was higher (5.6 cm) under the foliar multi-micronutrient and insecticide treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
pod lengthe4
Direction
highere2
Value
5.6 cme4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“pod length (5.6 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of grains per pod of pigeonpea was higher (212) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
number of grains/pode4
Direction
highere2
Value
212e4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“number of grains/pod (212)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruiting efficiency of pigeonpea was higher (16.8%) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
fruiting efficiencye4
Direction
highere2
Value
16.8%e4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“fruiting efficiency (16.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency of pigeonpea was higher (3.5 kg/ha/mm) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
water-use-efficiencye4
Direction
highere2
Value
3.5 kg/ha/mme4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“water-use-efficiency (3.5 kg/ha/mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production efficiency in rupees per hectare per day of pigeonpea was higher (366.7) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
production efficiency in term of ₹/ha/daye4
Direction
highere2
Value
366.7e4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“production efficiency in term of ₹/ha/day (366.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production efficiency in kg per hectare per day of pigeonpea was higher (8.61) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
kg/ha/daye4
Direction
highere2
Value
8.61e4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“and kg/ha/day (8.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of pigeonpea was higher (2286.5 kg/ha) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere2
Value
2286.5 kg/hae4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain yield (2286.5 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK uptake by the pigeonpea crop was higher under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
NPK-uptake by crope4
Direction
highere2
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“NPK-uptake by crop and net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return from pigeonpea was higher (96.83x103₹/ha) under the foliar treatment than under RDF alone.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litree2
Outcome
net returne4
Direction
highere2
Value
96.83x103₹/hae4
Comparator
RDF alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of multi-micronutrient 2 ml/litre + indoxacarb 1 ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later together with based application of RDF recorded higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly higher than foliar application of 2% urea, 0.5% borax and 0.5% ZnSO4 at 50% flowering individually together with basal application of RDF and RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1165 · show in text ↑
e4

“net return (96.83x103₹/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B:C ratio of pigeonpea was significantly higher (3.15) under foliar 1% urea with borax and ZnSO4 together with RDF.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
1% urea + 0.25% borax and ZnSO4 together with RDFe4
Outcome
B:C ratioe4
Direction
highere4
Value
3.15e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e4

“significantly higher B:C ratio (3.15) was registered under foliar application of 1% urea + 0.25% borax and ZnSO4 together with RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar indoxacarb followed by profenofos with RDF significantly reduced the incidence of pod borer and pod fly in pigeonpea compared with other treatments.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
indoxacarb 1ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later with RDFe3
Interactor
pod borere2pest
Second interactor
pod flye2pest
Outcome
incidence of pod borer and pod flye2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly reduced the incidence of pod borer and pod fly than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1594 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar application of indoxacarb 1ml/litre at 50% flowering fb profenofos 1 ml/litre 15 days later with RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, branches per plant and 100-grain weight of pigeonpea were unaffected by foliar nutrients and insecticides.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar application of nutrients and insecticidese2
Outcome
Plant height, branches/ plant, 100-grain weighte2
Direction
unaffectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant height, branches/ plant, 100-grain weight, and protein content in grain were unaffected by foliar application of nutrients and insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content in pigeonpea grain was unaffected by foliar nutrients and insecticides.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar application of nutrients and insecticidese2
Outcome
protein content in graine2
Direction
unaffectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“long duration pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan) (L.) Millsp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant height, branches/ plant, 100-grain weight, and protein content in grain were unaffected by foliar application of nutrients and insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1741 · show in text ↑

borax · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.