Paper · 1991 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM) improve phosphorus and zinc nutrition and growth of pigeonpea in a Vertisol

NP Wellings; AH Wearing; JP Thompson

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a glasshouse trial, pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) was grown in a Vertisol from the Darling Downs, Qld. The experimental design included two rates of inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi (nil and inoculated), three rates of phosphorus (P) application and two of zinc (Zn), and inoculation (nil and inoculated) with a recently discovered pathogen of pigeonpea, Phytophthora drechsleri Tucker (Pdr). lnoculation with the pathogen was included in the factorial design to investigate any effect of VAM on root rot. Plants responded to inoculation with VAM fungi, showing that the growth of pigeonpea is highly dependent upon mycorrhizal colonization of its root system. The mycorrhizal plants yielded, on average, 3.3 times the dry weight of the non-mycorrhizal plants. Shoot dry weight and Zn concentration of the shoots were both exponentially related to per cent VAM colonization of the root length ( R2 values of 0.904 and 0.644 respectively) and P concentration was linearly related to VAM colonization (R2 = 0.888). VAM increased P concentration, P uptake, Zn concentration, Zn uptake and P/Zn ratio, indicating enhanced growth through improved P and to a lesser extent Zn nutrition. Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil) without Phytophthora inoculation was fungitoxic to the mycorrhizae, decreasing per cent VAM colonization and depressing plant growth. lnoculation with Pdr did not result in infection and root rot symptoms. However, it did overcome the Zn toxicity, possibly through organic chelation effects, and thereby enhanced VAM colonization. Greatest VAM colonization and best plant nutrition and growth were obtained with the combination of VAM inoculation, Pdr inoculation, Zn (15 mg kg-1) and P (10 mg kg-1). Our results indicate the importance of maintaining adequate levels of VAM fungi in soil through appropriate agricultural practices in order to maximize pigeonpea growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea growth responded to inoculation with VAM fungi, with growth increased.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
inoculation with VAM fungie0
Interactor
VAM fungie0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants responded to inoculation with VAM fungi, showing that the growth of pigeonpea is highly dependent upon mycorrhizal colonization of its root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal pigeonpea plants yielded on average 3.3 times the dry weight of non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
mycorrhizale1
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
3.3 timese1
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mycorrhizal plants yielded, on average, 3.3 times the dry weight of the non-mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–787 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight of pigeonpea was exponentially related to per cent VAM colonization of the root length (R2 0.904).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
per cent VAM colonization of the root lengthe2
Outcome
Shoot dry weighte2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
0.904e2
Qualifier
exponentially relatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shoot dry weight and Zn concentration of the shoots were both exponentially related to per cent VAM colonization of the root length ( R2 values of 0.904 and 0.644 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–965 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn concentration of the shoots of pigeonpea was exponentially related to per cent VAM colonization of the root length (R2 0.644).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
per cent VAM colonization of the root lengthe2
Outcome
Zn concentration of the shootse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
0.644e2
Qualifier
exponentially relatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shoot dry weight and Zn concentration of the shoots were both exponentially related to per cent VAM colonization of the root length ( R2 values of 0.904 and 0.644 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–965 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P concentration of pigeonpea was linearly related to VAM colonization (R2 0.888).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
VAM colonizatione3
Outcome
P concentratione3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
0.888e3
Qualifier
linearly relatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“P concentration was linearly related to VAM colonization (R2 = 0.888)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM increased P concentration, P uptake and Zn concentration of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
VAMe4
Interactor
VAMe4symbiont
Outcome
P concentration, P uptake, Zn concentratione4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“VAM increased P concentration, P uptake, Zn concentration, Zn uptake and P/Zn ratio, indicating enhanced growth through improved P and to a lesser extent Zn nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM increased Zn uptake and the P/Zn ratio of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
VAMe4
Interactor
VAMe4symbiont
Outcome
Zn uptake and P/Zn ratioe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“VAM increased P concentration, P uptake, Zn concentration, Zn uptake and P/Zn ratio, indicating enhanced growth through improved P and to a lesser extent Zn nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil) decreased per cent VAM colonization of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil)e5
Outcome
per cent VAM colonizatione5
Direction
decreasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil) without Phytophthora inoculation was fungitoxic to the mycorrhizae, decreasing per cent VAM colonization and depressing plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil) depressed plant growth of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil)e5
Outcome
plant growthe5
Direction
depressinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Zinc fertilizer (15 mg kg-1 soil) without Phytophthora inoculation was fungitoxic to the mycorrhizae, decreasing per cent VAM colonization and depressing plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Phytophthora drechsleri (Pdr) did not result in infection or root rot symptoms in pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
lnoculation with Pdre6
Interactor
Phytophthora drechsleri Tucker (Pdr)Phytophthora drechslerie7pathogen
Outcome
infection and root rot symptomse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“lnoculation with Pdr did not result in infection and root rot symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1447 · show in text ↑
e7

“recently discovered pathogen of pigeonpea, Phytophthora drechsleri Tucker (Pdr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pdr inoculation overcame Zn toxicity and enhanced VAM colonization in pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
lnoculation with Pdre6
Outcome
VAM colonizatione7
Direction
enhancede7
Qualifier
overcome the Zn toxicitye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“lnoculation with Pdr did not result in infection and root rot symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1447 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, it did overcome the Zn toxicity, possibly through organic chelation effects, and thereby enhanced VAM colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1572 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic chelation effects possibly explain how Pdr overcame Zn toxicity in pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
Zn toxicitye7
Qualifier
organic chelation effectse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, it did overcome the Zn toxicity, possibly through organic chelation effects, and thereby enhanced VAM colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of VAM inoculation, Pdr inoculation, Zn and P gave the greatest VAM colonization and the best plant nutrition and growth of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
VAM inoculation, Pdr inoculation, Zn (15 mg kg-1) and P (10 mg kg-1)e5
Interactor
VAMe5symbiont
Second interactor
Pdre5pathogen
Outcome
VAM colonization and best plant nutrition and growthe5
Direction
Greateste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Greatest VAM colonization and best plant nutrition and growth were obtained with the combination of VAM inoculation, Pdr inoculation, Zn (15 mg kg-1) and P (10 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1742 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend maintaining adequate levels of VAM fungi in soil through appropriate agricultural practices to maximize pigeonpea growth.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
maintaining adequate levels of VAM fungi in soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicate the importance of maintaining adequate levels of VAM fungi in soil through appropriate agricultural practices in order to maximize pigeonpea growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1912 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

zinc atom · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.