Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

A claim from Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
palm bunch ash (PBA) and phosphorus and potassium (PK) fertiliser applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field study was undertaken in the semi-deciduous forest agro-ecological zone of Ghana to assess the impact of palm bunch ash (PBA) and phosphorus and potassium (PK) fertiliser application on yield and key agronomic traits of three early maturing pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–267
e1

“The results indicated that neither the genotype nor fertilisation had any significant effects on the grain yield of the pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–545

Title

Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield

S. Adjei-Nsiah; J.K. Ahiakpa; G. Asamoah-Asante Annals of Agricultural Sciences 2018. doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2018.05.001

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e850c3efd7ab4d0e95c37e1442cea26b6c89d03e32c05bb9e475ecfaf34e8940 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 159 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.