Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study nitrogen use efficiency in pigeonpea at Research farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India having three nipping treatments (no nipping, nipping at just start of branching and nipping at flower initiation) and five fertility levels (control, 20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha, 30 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 /ha, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha and 20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha + foliar spray of 2% N immediately after nipping) replicated thrice in split plot design during growing seasons of 2016 and 2017. Nipping at start of branching reduced the plant height, while increased primary and secondary branches, pods/plant and yield over no nipping. Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching. Among fertility levels, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / ha recorded significantly higher yield attributes with 39.7 per cent higher seed yield over control. Significantly higher agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N, partial N balance and NER were recorded with 20 kg/ha as compared to higher nitrogen doses.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching reduced plant height compared with no nipping.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- no nippinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e1“Nipping at start of branching reduced the plant height, while increased primary and secondary branches, pods/plant and yield over no nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching increased primary and secondary branches over no nipping.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge1
- Outcome
- primary and secondary branchese1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- no nippinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e1“Nipping at start of branching reduced the plant height, while increased primary and secondary branches, pods/plant and yield over no nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching increased pods per plant and yield over no nipping.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge1
- Outcome
- pods/plant and yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- no nippinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e1“Nipping at start of branching reduced the plant height, while increased primary and secondary branches, pods/plant and yield over no nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching gave significantly higher total N uptake and protein content.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge2
- Outcome
- total N uptake, protein contente2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e2“Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching gave significantly higher net return and benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge2
- Outcome
- net return, B: Ce2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e2“Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching gave significantly higher agronomic, physiologic and agro-physiological NUE.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge2
- Outcome
- agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUEe2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e2“Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping at the start of branching gave significantly higher apparent recovery efficiency, N utilization efficiency and partial N balance.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- nipping at start of branchinge2
- Outcome
- apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balancee2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e2“Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha treatment gave significantly higher yield attributes than control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / hae3
- Outcome
- yield attributese3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e3“Among fertility levels, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / ha recorded significantly higher yield attributes with 39.7 per cent higher seed yield over control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha treatment gave 39.7 per cent higher seed yield than control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / hae3
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 39.7 per cente3
- Comparator
- controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e3“Among fertility levels, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / ha recorded significantly higher yield attributes with 39.7 per cent higher seed yield over control”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 20 kg N/ha gave significantly higher agronomic, physiologic and agro-physiological NUE than higher nitrogen doses.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/hae4
- Outcome
- agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUEe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- higher nitrogen dosese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e4“Significantly higher agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N, partial N balance and NER were recorded with 20 kg/ha as compared to higher nitrogen doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 20 kg N/ha gave significantly higher apparent recovery efficiency and N utilization efficiency than higher nitrogen doses.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/hae4
- Outcome
- apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of Ne4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- higher nitrogen dosese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e4“Significantly higher agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N, partial N balance and NER were recorded with 20 kg/ha as compared to higher nitrogen doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 20 kg N/ha gave significantly higher partial N balance and NER than higher nitrogen doses.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/hae4
- Outcome
- partial N balance and NERe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- higher nitrogen dosese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”
e4“Significantly higher agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N, partial N balance and NER were recorded with 20 kg/ha as compared to higher nitrogen doses”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.