Nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)

1. Zea mays subsp. maysPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. iron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. RhizobiumResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Vigna mungoResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. cadmium atomResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
7. elemental sulfurResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Rhizophagus fasciculatusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. thioureaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. fertilizationPositive and negative results36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. intercroppingPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. phosphorusResults agree23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. inoculationResults agree20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. potassiumResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. mycorrhizaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. irrigationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. micronutrientResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.