Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Productivity, nutrient uptake, microbial activity and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by foliar application of nano fertilizers

Pragathi RP; Pandit S Rathod; Patil DH; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi, during kharif season of 2022 to study the growth and yield of pigeonpea as influenced by foliar application of nano DAP. The experiment consisted with split plot design consisting of three levels of RDF in main plots viz., 50% RDF (M1), 75% RDF (M2) and 100% RDF (M3) and four levels of nano DAP spray in sub plots viz., 2 ml litre-1 of water (S1), 4 ml litre-1 of water (S2), 6 ml litre-1 of water (S3) and Seed treatment with Nano DAP @ 5ml kg-1 seeds (S4). The results revealed that among different treatment combinations application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher seed yield than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1167 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher stalk yield than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4173 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher N uptake than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
121.40 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher P uptake than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.34 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher K uptake than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
79.87 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher gross returns than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 75843 ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher net returns than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 37444 ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher B:C ratio than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.98e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.