Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher net returns than other combinations.

A claim from Productivity, nutrient uptake, microbial activity and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by foliar application of nano fertilizers · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 percent RDF with nano DAP at 4 ml litre-1 gave higher net returns than other combinations.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of watere0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 37444 ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Kalaburagie1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 percent RDF with foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml litre-1 of water recorded significantly higher seed yield (1167 kg ha-1), stalk yield (4173 kg ha-1), N uptake (121.40 kg ha-1), P uptake (17.34 kg ha-1), K uptake (79.87 kg ha-1), gross returns (Rs. 75843 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 37444 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.98) as compared to other treatment combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–985
e1

“Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–83
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95

Title

Productivity, nutrient uptake, microbial activity and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by foliar application of nano fertilizers

Pragathi RP; Pandit S Rathod; Patil DH; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i9sh.1548

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d19e145a6becf9f236f79989eab6ad18eaeaa02f6ff233d59be84b0f3825a7b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Minimum yield (19.45 q/ha) occurred under no protection, with the highest infestation (40.6%).

    Yield Loss assessment and Economic injury level of Pod Borer complex in Pigeon pea · 2009 · compared with full protection (FP)

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Residual recommended NP to preceding sunflower improved succeeding pigeonpea yield attributes and yields.

    Effect of sunflower stover and nutrient management on productivity and nutrient uptake pattern of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in pigeonpeasunflower (Helianthus annuus) cropping system · 2001 · compared with Control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Nano micronutrient foliar spray with RDF increased pigeonpea grain yield relative to RDF alone.

    Effect of Conventional and Nano Micronutrient Fertilizers on Yield and Economics of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.] · 2019 · compared with RDF alone

    Same direction

  4. positive
    The 90 x 30 cm spacing with NP 125% produced higher seed yield than other specified combinations and was comparable to 90 x 30 cm with 100 percent NP.

    Effect of planting geometry and nutrients levels on yield, yield attributes and economics of pigeonpea genotypes · 2015 · compared with 60 x 30 cm with 100 per cent NP

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Nano foliar micronutrients with RDF increased pigeonpea grain yield over RDF alone.

    Effect of conventional and nano micronutrient fertilizers on yield and economics of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] · 2017 · compared with RDF alone

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The treatment gave significantly higher pod number, pod yield and pod-bearing length.

    Influence of nano urea on growth, yield and quality of pigeon pea · 2024

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Grade-I micronutrient treatment gave significantly higher grain yield.

    Effect of graded levels of potassium and micronutrients on yield, quality and nutrient uptake in pigeon pea through soil and foliar application under Vertisols · 2020 · compared with 100% NP + 50 kg K20 ha-1 + Grade-II (0.5%) micronutrient

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Pigeon pea plus black gram with 50% RDP and nano P yielded 1977 kg/ha black gram.

    Utilization of cultivable upland of Jharkhand through legume based intercropping system · 2018

    Same direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Within individual years, 75% recommended phosphate with PSB soil application gave yield, GMR and NMR at par with the 50 kg P2O5 application.

    Effect of land configuration and phosphate management on growth and yield of semi-rabi pigeonpea · 2013 · compared with 50 kg P 2 O 5 application (100% recommended P 2 O 5 )

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Normal soil application of commercial fertilizers without irrigation gave significantly lower number of pods, seed weight and yield attributes.

    Standardization of fertigation technology for transplanted pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Spraying a sugar solution did not increase the yield of the A line in net houses.

    Honey bee mediated (Apis mellifera L.) hybrid pigeonpea seed production under net house condition. · 2018

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Growth regulators and foliar fertilizer had no effect on pod set or final pod number.

    Influence of Nutrition and Bioregulators on Flower Retention, Pod Set and Yield on Pigeon Peas (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Huth) · 1981

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Plant height, branches per plant and 100-grain weight of pigeonpea were unaffected by foliar nutrients and insecticides.

    Response of long duration pigeonpea (Cajanus Cajan L .) to foliar application of nutrients and insecticides under rainfed condition of Bihar · 2024

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar fertilization with 2% urea and 2% KCl gave no significant difference in pigeonpea yield.

    Influence of Drought Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Pigeonpea · 2009 · compared with 2% KCl

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Mixed emamectin benzoate and acetamiprid spray produced the maximum yield increase of 64.22%.

    Management of pigeonpea pod borers with special reference to pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa) · 2011

    Same direction

  8. positive
    total dry matter accumulation was higher under zinc biofortification than other treatments (210.79 g).

    Growth, Yield and Economics of Pigeonpea as Influenced by Biofortification of Zinc and Iron · 2020 · compared with rest of the treatments

    Same direction

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

    Comparison of N2 Fixation and Yields in Cajanus cajan between Hydrogenase-Positive and Hydrogenase-Negative Rhizobia by In Situ Acetylene Reduction Assays and Direct 15N Partitioning · 1983

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Vermicompost and phosphocompost gave identical growth and yield outcomes.

    Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties to organic manures and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil · 2006 · compared with phosphoeompost

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments had no effect on green pod yield.

    Influence of Fertility Level on the Protein Content and Agronomic Characters of Pigeonpeas in an Oxisol · 1971

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

    Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Growth regulators and foliar fertilizer had no effect on pod set or final pod number.

    Influence of Nutrition and Bioregulators on Flower Retention, Pod Set and Yield on Pigeon Peas (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Huth) · 1981

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Organic fertilizer had no effect on Cajanus cajan productivity compared with the control

    Effect of Cow Dung as Organic Manure on the Productivity of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp (Pigeon pea) · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Increasing fertilizer did not significantly increase equivalent yield in pigeonpea plus urdbean.

    Production Potential and Economic Feasibility of Planting Pattern and Nutrient Management in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Based Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fertilizer improved pigeon pea yields by 32–449% compared with unfertilized intercrops.

    Sustainable Intensification with Cereal-Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa · 2019 · compared with unfertilized intercrops

    Same direction

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.