Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Influence of nano urea on growth, yield and quality of pigeon pea

Amruta Chandrashekhar Mirji; C Seenappa; TG Amrutha; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted at ZARS, GKVK, Bangalore, Karnataka, India during Kharif 2021 on influence of nano urea on growth, yield and quality of pigeonpea. Results indicated that application of RDF (Nano Urea) + foliar application of ZnSO4 @ 0.5% + ZnSO4 @ 0.5% resulted significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (116.2), pod yield (52.3 g plant-1), pod bearing length plant-1 (64.7 cm) seed yield (1179 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (4568 kg ha-1) and higher uptake of nutrients (kg ha-1) i.e., nitrogen (111.5), phosphorus (16.9) and potassium (82.3) hence higher nutrient use efficiency (kg grains kg-1 nutrient applied) i.e., nitrogen (93.0), phosphorus (23.58) and potassium use efficiency (47.16) and across the different phenophases of crop, from 120 DAS till harvest higher values of absolute growth rate (1.97 g plant-1 day-1), crop growth rate (14.57 g m-2 day-1) and relative growth rate (0.012 g g-1 day-1) were observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave significantly higher pod number, pod yield and pod-bearing length.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
RDF (Nano Urea) + foliar application of ZnSO4 @ 0.5% + ZnSO4 @ 0.5%e0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
116.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of RDF (Nano Urea) + foliar application of ZnSO4 @ 0.5% + ZnSO4 @ 0.5% resulted significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (116.2), pod yield (52.3 g plant-1), pod bearing length plant-1 (64.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield under the treatment was significantly higher at 52.3 g plant-1.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
RDF (Nano Urea)t1
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
52.3 g plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (116.2), pod yield (52.3 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–360 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–164 · show in text ↑
t1

“RDF (Nano Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod-bearing length was significantly higher at 64.7 cm.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
RDF (Nano Urea)t1
Outcome
pod bearing length plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
64.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (116.2), pod yield (52.3 g plant-1), pod bearing length plant-1 (64.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–164 · show in text ↑
t1

“RDF (Nano Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was significantly higher at 1179 kg ha-1.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
RDF (Nano Urea)t1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1179 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (116.2), pod yield (52.3 g plant-1), pod bearing length plant-1 (64.7 cm) seed yield (1179 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–164 · show in text ↑
t1

“RDF (Nano Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk yield was significantly higher at 4568 kg ha-1.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
RDF (Nano Urea)t1
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4568 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stalk yield (4568 kg ha-1) and higher uptake of nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–164 · show in text ↑
t1

“RDF (Nano Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–219 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.