Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sorghum yields were significantly different among treatments and lowest with a tuber intercrop.

A claim from Effect of cropping systems on cereal stemborers in the cool‐wet and semi‐arid ecozones of the Amhara region of Ethiopia · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum yields were significantly different among treatments and lowest with a tuber intercrop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropped with a tuber crope0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
per plant and per unit areae0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences between treatments in yields of both sorghum and maize (per plant and per unit area) with the lowest yields observed when they were intercropped with a tuber crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1534

Title

Effect of cropping systems on cereal stemborers in the cool‐wet and semi‐arid ecozones of the Amhara region of Ethiopia

M. Wale; F. Schulthess; Eunice W. Kairu; et al. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00324.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-7970dceb3f5c2ebe8105375ea9cc541583af9dd372edededc9fdfe047901710b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.