Paper · 2023 · Green Processing and Synthesis

Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with mesosulfuron methyl and mesosulfuron methyl + florasulam + MCPA isooctyl to manage weeds of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Bilal Ahmad Khan; Muhammad Ather Nadeem; Mudassar Iqbal; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Nanoherbicides are articulated by empowering the potential of nanotechnology for the efficacious delivery of chemical or biological herbicides with the aid of nanomaterial‐based herbicide combinations. Therefore, the goal of this work was to investigate the chitosan nanoparticles loaded with mesosulfuron methyl and mesosulfuron methyl + florasulam + (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid) MCPA isooctyl herbicides as a possible environmentally benign substitute to manage weeds in wheat. Due to intriguing characteristics including biocompatibility, low allergenicity, biodegradability, and nontoxicity, chitosan biopolymers as sustainable chitin derivatives have received intense scrutiny in the biomedical business. The manufactured nanoparticles were characterized by using ultraviolet absorbance, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The average particle size as revealed by SEM was 40–70 nm in a cluster form with the porous structure. The maximum absorption peaks of both nanoparticles of mesosulfuron methyl and mesosulfuron methyl + florasulam + MCPA isooctyl were 330 and 360 nm. The FT-IR analysis showed an intensive peak at 2 θ value of 30.55° for mesosulfuron methyl and 32.79° for mesosulfuron methyl + florasula + MCPA isooctyl, which correspond to the 78 and 198 planes of the anatase phase, respectively. The nanoparticles were sprayed at the third to fourth leaf stages of the targeted weeds. Seven different doses were applied. A total of 100% mortality and visual injury were caused by the chitosan-based nanoparticles of both herbicides at the recommended dose of standard herbicide. The 5-fold lower dose showed the minimum chlorophyll content (5.75%), plant height (2.35 cm), fresh biomass (1.08 g), and dry biomass (0.33 g) of a weed mixture. For the same traits, the herbicide nanoparticles at 10-fold lower dose of commercial herbicides exhibited a similar effect as the recommended dose. Nanoherbicides could recuperate the conventional herbicide effectiveness by enhancing the stability and reducing the toxicity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron methyl nanoparticles caused 100% weed mortality and visual injury at the standard dose.

Treatment
chitosan-based nanoparticles of both herbicidese0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
mortality and visual injurye0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
recommended dose of standard herbicidee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 100% mortality and visual injury were caused by the chitosan-based nanoparticles of both herbicides at the recommended dose of standard herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a fivefold lower dose, weed chlorophyll content reached 5.75%.

Treatment
5-fold lower dosee0
Interactor
weede0weedt0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
minimume0
Value
5.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-fold lower dose showed the minimum chlorophyll content (5.75%), plant height (2.35 cm), fresh biomass (1.08 g), and dry biomass (0.33 g) of a weed mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a fivefold lower dose, weed height reached 2.35 cm.

Treatment
5-fold lower dosee0
Interactor
weede0weedt0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
2.35 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-fold lower dose showed the minimum chlorophyll content (5.75%), plant height (2.35 cm), fresh biomass (1.08 g), and dry biomass (0.33 g) of a weed mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a fivefold lower dose, weed fresh biomass reached 1.08 g.

Treatment
5-fold lower dosee0
Interactor
weede0weedt0
Outcome
fresh biomasse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.08 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-fold lower dose showed the minimum chlorophyll content (5.75%), plant height (2.35 cm), fresh biomass (1.08 g), and dry biomass (0.33 g) of a weed mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a fivefold lower dose, weed dry biomass reached 0.33 g.

Treatment
5-fold lower dosee0
Interactor
weede0weedt0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.33 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-fold lower dose showed the minimum chlorophyll content (5.75%), plant height (2.35 cm), fresh biomass (1.08 g), and dry biomass (0.33 g) of a weed mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At tenfold lower dose, nanoparticle herbicides had an effect similar to the commercial recommended dose on these weed traits.

Treatment
herbicide nanoparticles at 10-fold lower dosee0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
same traitse0
Direction
similar effecte0
Comparator
recommended dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the same traits, the herbicide nanoparticles at 10-fold lower dose of commercial herbicides exhibited a similar effect as the recommended dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–2001 · show in text ↑
t0

“weeds of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–132 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 20 positive, 32 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.