Paper · 2023 · PLoS ONE

Single and co-inoculum of endophytic bacteria promote growth and yield of Jerusalem artichoke through upregulation of plant genes under drought stress

Patcha Boonmahome; Junthima Namwongsa; Nimitr Vorasoot; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Helianthus tuberosus L. (Jerusalem artichoke) produce inulin, a type of fructan, which possesses several biotechnology applications, e.g., sugar syrup, prebiotics, fiber in diabetic food, enabling blood sugar and cholesterol reduction. Drought reduces inulin accumulation in the tubers of Jerusalem artichoke as the plants protect themselves from this stress by induction of stress gene responses, effecting growth reduction. Endophytic bacteria are promising candidates to promote plant growth and yield particularly under abiotic stress. Therefore, three endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting properties were examined for their ability to improve Jerusalem artichoke growth and yield under both well-watered and drought conditions when inoculated individually or in combinations in pot experiments with 2 factorial random complete block design. The interactions of the endophytic bacteria and plant host determined the differential gene expression in response to drought as revealed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Single inoculum of the endophytic bacteria increased the height, weight, root traits, and harvest index of Jerusalem artichoke compared to co-inocula under both well-watered and drought conditions. However, the co-inocula of Rossellomorea aquimaris strain 3.13 and Bacillus velezensis strain 5.18 proved to be a synergistic combination leading to high inulin accumulation; while the co-inocula of B. velezensis strain 5.18 and Micrococcus luteus strain 4.43 were not beneficial when used in combination. The genes, dehydrin like protein and ethylene responsive element binding factor, were upregulated in the plants inoculated with single inoculum and co-inocula of all endophytic bacteria during drought stress. Moreover, the gene expression of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) amido synthetase were up-regulated in Jerusalem artichoke inoculated with M. luteus strain 4.43 during drought stress. The fructan:fructan 1-fructosyltransferase (1-FFT) was also stimulated by the endophytic bacteria particularly in drought condition; the results of this study could explain the relationship between endophytic bacteria and plant host for growth and yield promotion under well-watered and drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single bacterial inocula increased height, weight and root traits relative to co-inocula under both watering conditions.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
Single inoculum of the endophytic bacteriae0
Outcome
height, weight, root traitse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under both well-watered and drought conditionse0
Comparator
co-inoculae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single inoculum of the endophytic bacteria increased the height, weight, root traits, and harvest index of Jerusalem artichoke compared to co-inocula under both well-watered and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single bacterial inocula increased harvest index relative to co-inocula.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
Single inoculum of the endophytic bacteriae0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
co-inoculae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single inoculum of the endophytic bacteria increased the height, weight, root traits, and harvest index of Jerusalem artichoke compared to co-inocula under both well-watered and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The R. aquimaris and B. velezensis co-inoculum led to high inulin accumulation.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
co-inocula of Rossellomorea aquimaris strain 3.13 and Bacillus velezensis strain 5.18e0
Interactor
Rossellomorea aquimaris strain 3.13Rossellomorea aquimarise0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus velezensis strain 5.18Bacillus velezensise0symbiont
Outcome
inulin accumulatione0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-inocula of Rossellomorea aquimaris strain 3.13 and Bacillus velezensis strain 5.18 proved to be a synergistic combination leading to high inulin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B. velezensis and M. luteus combination was not beneficial.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
co-inocula of B. velezensis strain 5.18 and Micrococcus luteus strain 4.43e0
Interactor
B. velezensis strain 5.18Bacillus velezensise0symbiont
Second interactor
Micrococcus luteus strain 4.43Micrococcus luteuse0symbiont
Outcome
not beneficiale0
Direction
not beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Micrococcus luteus
Micrococcus luteus · Second interactorAlonnardi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-inocula of B. velezensis strain 5.18 and Micrococcus luteus strain 4.43 were not beneficial when used in combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined endophyte inocula upregulated dehydrin like protein and ethylene responsive element binding factor genes during drought.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
single inoculum and co-inocula of all endophytic bacteriae0
Outcome
dehydrin like protein and ethylene responsive element binding factore0
Direction
upregulatede0
Qualifier
during drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genes, dehydrin like protein and ethylene responsive element binding factor, were upregulated in the plants inoculated with single inoculum and co-inocula of all endophytic bacteria during drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. luteus inoculation upregulated IAA amido synthetase expression during drought.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
inoculated with M. luteus strain 4.43e0
Interactor
M. luteus strain 4.43Micrococcus luteuse0symbiont
Outcome
gene expression of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) amido synthetasee0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Micrococcus luteus
Micrococcus luteus · InteractorAlonnardi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the gene expression of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) amido synthetase were up-regulated in Jerusalem artichoke inoculated with M. luteus strain 4.43 during drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic bacteria stimulated 1-FFT, particularly during drought.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
endophytic bacteriae0
Outcome
fructan:fructan 1-fructosyltransferase (1-FFT)e0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
particularly in drought conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fructan:fructan 1-fructosyltransferase (1-FFT) was also stimulated by the endophytic bacteria particularly in drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–93 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.