Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Effect of weed management on weed dynamics, crop growth, fodder yield and economics of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) African tall under Chhattisgarh condition

Krishna Kumar Narang; SK Jha

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fodder maize is palatable and nutritious which can be fed as green or dry and makes excellent silage. But it is heavily infested with weeds which often inflicts huge yield and quality losses. A field experiment was conducted at Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur during Kharif 2017. Results showed that the lowest weed density and dry weight was recorded in tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence followed by hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing and topramezone 35 g + atrazine 250 g ha-1 as post emergence. These herbicides also recorded higher weed control efficiency (93-95%) and the lowest weed index (1-2%). Highest green and dry fodder yield were also obtained with the tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence followed by hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing and topramezone 35 g + atrazine 250 g ha-1 as post emergence. Similarly, crude protein yield was also highest under these combinations. Among herbicides, the highest net returns (Rs 41768 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.68) were also highest with tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence followed by hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing and topramezone 35 g + atrazine 250 g ha-1 as post emergence. Thus, this study suggests tank-mixed herbicide application for better weed control in fodder maize rather than their sole application. These combinations of herbicides may be the alternative of manual weeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The atrazine and pendimethalin tank mix gave the lowest weed density and dry weight, with hand weeding and topramezone plus atrazine following.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergencee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed density and dry weighte1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest weed density and dry weight was recorded in tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence followed by hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing and topramezone 35 g + atrazine 250 g ha-1 as post emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides achieved 93–95% weed control efficiency.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
These herbicidese1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Value
93-95%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“These herbicides also recorded higher weed control efficiency (93-95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides yielded a weed index of 1–2%.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
These herbicidese1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed indexe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1-2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“These herbicides also recorded higher weed control efficiency (93-95%) and the lowest weed index (1-2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix, hand weeding, and topramezone plus atrazine treatments gave the highest green and dry fodder yield.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergencee1
Outcome
green and dry fodder yielde1
Direction
Higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest green and dry fodder yield were also obtained with the tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence followed by hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing and topramezone 35 g + atrazine 250 g ha-1 as post emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These weed management combinations had the highest crude protein yield.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
these combinationse1
Outcome
crude protein yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“crude protein yield was also highest under these combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix treatment produced the highest net returns among herbicides.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergencee1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
Rs 41768 ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest net returns (Rs 41768 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.68) were also highest with tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix treatment had the highest benefit: cost ratio among herbicides.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Treatment
atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergencee1
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.68e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“benefit: cost ratio (2.68) were also highest with tank mix application of atrazine 750 g + pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1218 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend tank-mixed herbicides for weed control in fodder maize as an alternative to manual weeding.

Taxon
fodder maizee0
Outcome
tank-mixed herbicide application for better weed controle1
Comparator
manual weedinge2

Verbatim

e0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“this study suggests tank-mixed herbicide application for better weed control in fodder maize rather than their sole application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1476 · show in text ↑
e2

“These combinations of herbicides may be the alternative of manual weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1551 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.