Paper · 2023 · Agriculture

Electron Beam Irradiation to Control Rhizoctonia solani in Potato

Natalya Chulikova; Anna Malyuga; Polina Borshchegovskaya; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study focuses on the influence of pre-planting irradiation on the development, health, and yield of seed potatoes infected with Rhizoctonia solani. The research was prompted by the need to ensure crop security and sustainability in the modern-day environment, which calls into question the future sufficiency of crop yields. Considering that the focus has shifted to non-chemical methods of crop treatment at all plant development stages in response to more stringent regulations governing potato production, it is particularly important to refine physics-based methods to suppress fungal diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Irradiation of tubers with 20–150 Gy inhibited the potato development phases and the doses exceeding 150 Gy completely suppressed the potato sprouting. Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gy decreased the quantity of large tubers by 10–20% on average while the number of medium and small tubers increased by 5–15% and 3–10%, respectively. Irradiation of seed potatoes also decreased the sclerotia and non-sclerotia forms of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani in the harvested tubers. It was found that 1 MeV electron irradiation with doses ranging from 20 Gy to 30 Gy is the most efficient for the pre-planting treatment of seed potatoes since the penetration of low-energy accelerated electrons into the upper layers of potato tubers ensures the suppression of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani by at least 10% from the value of non-irradiated samples and prevents the reduction of total yield allowing for a maximum of 25% loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 20–150 Gy inhibited potato development phases.

Treatment
Irradiation of tubers with 20–150 Gye0
Outcome
potato development phasese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation of tubers with 20–150 Gy inhibited the potato development phases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doses above 150 Gy completely suppressed potato sprouting.

Treatment
doses exceeding 150 Gye0
Outcome
potato sproutinge0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the doses exceeding 150 Gy completely suppressed the potato sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 20–100 Gy reduced large tuber quantity by 10–20%.

Treatment
Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gye0
Outcome
quantity of large tuberse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10–20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gy decreased the quantity of large tubers by 10–20% on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 20–100 Gy increased medium tuber number by 5–15%.

Treatment
Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gye0
Outcome
number of mediume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5–15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gy decreased the quantity of large tubers by 10–20% on average while the number of medium and small tubers increased by 5–15% and 3–10%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 20–100 Gy increased small tuber number by 3–10%.

Treatment
Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gye0
Outcome
small tuberse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3–10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doses ranging from 20 Gy to 100 Gy decreased the quantity of large tubers by 10–20% on average while the number of medium and small tubers increased by 5–15% and 3–10%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed potato irradiation reduced sclerotia and non-sclerotia Rhizoctonia disease forms in harvested tubers.

Treatment
Irradiation of seed potatoese0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
sclerotia and non-sclerotia forms of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solanie0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation of seed potatoes also decreased the sclerotia and non-sclerotia forms of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani in the harvested tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 1 MeV irradiation at 20–30 Gy as the most efficient pre-planting seed potato treatment.

Treatment
1 MeV electron irradiation with doses ranging from 20 Gy to 30 Gye0
Outcome
most efficient for the pre-planting treatment of seed potatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1 MeV electron irradiation with doses ranging from 20 Gy to 30 Gy is the most efficient for the pre-planting treatment of seed potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-energy electron penetration suppressed Rhizoctonia disease at least 10% relative to non-irradiated samples.

Treatment
low-energy accelerated electronse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solanie0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
at least 10%e0
Comparator
non-irradiated samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penetration of low-energy accelerated electrons into the upper layers of potato tubers ensures the suppression of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani by at least 10% from the value of non-irradiated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected irradiation treatment prevented total-yield reduction while allowing up to 25% loss.

Treatment
1 MeV electron irradiation with doses ranging from 20 Gy to 30 Gye1
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
prevents the reductione0
Value
25% losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prevents the reduction of total yield allowing for a maximum of 25% loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“1 MeV electron irradiation with doses ranging from 20 Gy to 30 Gy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑

electron · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

radiation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

radiation · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.