Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Performance evaluation of tractor drawn onion seed planter

Lokesh Kumar; Purvi Tiwari; AK Dave

14
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha. After lab testing best combination of speed of operation (3 km h-1) and plate size (18 plate grooves) was selected. The field test of existing onion seed planter was performed in instructional farm of IGKV. The theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, speed of operation and plant population per hectare was found to be 0.585 ha h-1, 0.462 ha h-1, 78.97%, 3 km h-1, and 755039 respectively. The total input energy required for onion cultivation was calculated as 13810.77 MJ ha-1. The cost economics of existing onion seed planter was found to be 1312.14 Rs ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter seed rate was 9.67 kg ha-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
seed ratee0
Value
9.67 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
3 km h-1 with 18 plate groovese0
Setting
lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter quality of feed index was 88.80%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
quality of feed indexe0
Value
88.80%e0
Qualifier
3 km h-1 with 30 plate groovese0
Setting
lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter multiple index was 5.24%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
multiple indexe0
Value
5.24%e0
Qualifier
3 km h-1 with 18 plate groovese0
Setting
lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter miss index was 5.09%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
miss indexe0
Value
5.09%e0
Qualifier
3 km h-1 with 30 plate groovese0
Setting
lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter seed to seed spacing was 7.49 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
seed to seed spacinge0
Value
7.49 cme0
Qualifier
3 km h-1 with 18 plate groovese0
Setting
lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter theoretical seeding rate was 8,88,888 seeds/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
theoretical seeding ratee0
Value
8,88,888 seeds/hae0
Setting
lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existing onion seed planter was tested in lab of SVCAET&RS, IGKV Raipur and the seed rate, quality of feed index, multiple index, miss index, seed to seed spacing and theoretical seeding rate was found to be 9.67 kg ha-1 at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 88.80% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 5.24% at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves, 5.09% at 3 km h-1 with 30 plate grooves, 7.49 cm at 3 km h-1 with 18 plate grooves and 8,88,888 seeds/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–448 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected operating combination was 3 km h-1 and 18 plate grooves.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
best combination of speed of operation (3 km h-1) and plate size (18 plate grooves)e0
Value
3 km h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After lab testing best combination of speed of operation (3 km h-1) and plate size (18 plate grooves) was selected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field theoretical field capacity was 0.585 ha h-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
theoretical field capacitye0
Value
0.585 ha h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, speed of operation and plant population per hectare was found to be 0.585 ha h-1, 0.462 ha h-1, 78.97%, 3 km h-1, and 755039 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field effective field capacity was 0.462 ha h-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
effective field capacitye0
Value
0.462 ha h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, speed of operation and plant population per hectare was found to be 0.585 ha h-1, 0.462 ha h-1, 78.97%, 3 km h-1, and 755039 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field field efficiency was 78.97%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
78.97%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, speed of operation and plant population per hectare was found to be 0.585 ha h-1, 0.462 ha h-1, 78.97%, 3 km h-1, and 755039 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field speed of operation was 3 km h-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
speed of operatione0
Value
3 km h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, speed of operation and plant population per hectare was found to be 0.585 ha h-1, 0.462 ha h-1, 78.97%, 3 km h-1, and 755039 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field plant population per hectare was 755039.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
plant population per hectaree0
Value
755039e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, speed of operation and plant population per hectare was found to be 0.585 ha h-1, 0.462 ha h-1, 78.97%, 3 km h-1, and 755039 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total onion cultivation input energy was 13810.77 MJ ha-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
total input energye0
Value
13810.77 MJ ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total input energy required for onion cultivation was calculated as 13810.77 MJ ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–960 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion planter cost was 1312.14 Rs ha-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
cost economicse0
Value
1312.14 Rs ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cost economics of existing onion seed planter was found to be 1312.14 Rs ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1043 · show in text ↑