Abstract
A field experiment was carried out in winter 2019 in the north of Basra Governorate to find response of four varieties of wheat (Baraka, Tammuz-2, Latifia and Ibaa-95) to different concentrations of iron nano-fertilizer (0, 1, 2 and 3 g L-1). The experiment was designed by applying factorial experiments using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. This study revealed the superiority of variety Baraka in grain yield and biological yield, which reached 4.892 and 12.943 ton ha-1, respectively, as a result of its superiority in growth characteristics and yield components. Iron nano-fertilizer exhibited a significant impact on all studied traits, so that, 3 g L-1 displayed the highest average of grain yield (4.966 ton ha-1). Regarding to the interactions, the variety Baraka by spraying iron nan-fertilizer at 3 g L-1 exhibited the highest average of grain yield (5.800 ton ha-1) due to its superiority in yield components.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Baraka grain yield reached 4.892 ton ha-1 and was superior.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of variety Baraka in grain yield and biological yield, which reached 4.892 and 12.943 ton ha-1, respectively”
t0“wheat varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Baraka biological yield reached 12.943 ton ha-1 and was superior.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Barakae0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 12.943 ton ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of variety Baraka in grain yield and biological yield, which reached 4.892 and 12.943 ton ha-1, respectively”
t0“wheat varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron nano-fertilizer significantly affected all studied traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Iron nano-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Iron nano-fertilizer exhibited a significant impact on all studied traits”
t0“wheat varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
The 3 g L-1 fertilizer rate had the highest average grain yield of 4.966 ton ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3 g L-1e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.966 ton ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“3 g L-1 displayed the highest average of grain yield (4.966 ton ha-1)”
t0“wheat varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Baraka sprayed at 3 g L-1 gave the highest average grain yield of 5.800 ton ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Barakae0
- Treatment
- spraying iron nan-fertilizer at 3 g L-1e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.800 ton ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the variety Baraka by spraying iron nan-fertilizer at 3 g L-1 exhibited the highest average of grain yield (5.800 ton ha-1)”
t0“wheat varieties”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.