Paper · 2023 · Plants

Long-Term Tillage and Crop Rotation Regimes Reshape Soil-Borne Oomycete Communities in Soybean, Corn, and Wheat Production Systems

Alison Claire Gahagan; Yichao Shi; Devon Radford; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil-borne oomycetes include devastating plant pathogens that cause substantial losses in the agricultural sector. To better manage this important group of pathogens, it is critical to understand how they respond to common agricultural practices, such as tillage and crop rotation. Here, a long-term field experiment was established using a split-plot design with tillage as the main plot factor (conventional tillage (CT) vs. no till (NT), two levels) and rotation as the subplot factor (monocultures of soybean, corn, or wheat, and corn–soybean–wheat rotation, four levels). Post-harvest soil oomycete communities were characterized over three consecutive years (2016–2018) by metabarcoding the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 (ITS1) region. The community contained 292 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and was dominated by Globisporangium spp. (85.1% in abundance, 203 ASV) and Pythium spp. (10.4%, 51 ASV). NT decreased diversity and community compositional structure heterogeneity, while crop rotation only affected the community structure under CT. The interaction effects of tillage and rotation on most oomycetes species accentuated the complexity of managing these pathogens. Soil and crop health represented by soybean seedling vitality was lowest in soils under CT cultivating soybean or corn, while the grain yield of the three crops responded differently to tillage and crop rotation regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabarcoding of post-harvest soil oomycete communities over 2016-2018 found 292 amplicon sequence variants.

Taxon
soil oomycetee0
Outcome
292 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs)e0
Value
292e0

Verbatim

e0

“Post-harvest soil oomycete communities were characterized over three consecutive years (2016–2018) by metabarcoding the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 (ITS1) region. The community contained 292 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–803 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oomycete community was dominated by Globisporangium spp. at 85.1% in abundance (203 ASVs).

Taxon
Globisporangium spp.Globisporangiume0
Outcome
abundancee0
Value
85.1%e0
Qualifier
203 ASVe0

Verbatim

e0

“dominated by Globisporangium spp. (85.1% in abundance, 203 ASV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–875 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium spp. made up 10.4% of the oomycete community abundance (51 ASVs).

Taxon
Pythium spp.Pythiume0
Outcome
abundancee0
Value
10.4%e0
Qualifier
51 ASVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pythium
Pythium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“abundance, 203 ASV) and Pythium spp. (10.4%, 51 ASV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till decreased oomycete diversity and community compositional structure heterogeneity compared with conventional tillage.

Taxon
Soil-borne oomycetese0
Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
diversity and community compositional structure heterogeneitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
conventional tillage (CT)e2

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-borne oomycetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“NT decreased diversity and community compositional structure heterogeneity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–984 · show in text ↑
e2

“conventional tillage (CT) vs. no till (NT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation affected the oomycete community structure only under conventional tillage.

Taxon
Soil-borne oomycetese0
Treatment
crop rotatione1
Outcome
community structuree1
Qualifier
under CTe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-borne oomycetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop rotation only affected the community structure under CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and rotation had interaction effects on most oomycete species.

Taxon
oomycetesOomycotae0
Treatment
tillage and rotatione0
Outcome
most oomycetes speciese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effects of tillage and rotation on most oomycetes species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seedling vitality, representing soil and crop health, was lowest in soils under conventional tillage cultivating soybean or corn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
soybean seedling vitalitye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil and crop health represented by soybean seedling vitality was lowest in soils under CT cultivating soybean or corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain yield of the three crops responded differently to tillage and crop rotation regimes.

Taxon
three cropse0
Treatment
tillage and crop rotation regimese0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of the three crops responded differently to tillage and crop rotation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1403 · show in text ↑

tillage · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.