Paper · 2014 · Weed Science

Weed Community Dynamics and Suppression in Tilled and No-Tillage Transitional Organic Winter Rye–Soybean Systems

Emily R. Bernstein; David E. Stoltenberg; Joshua L. Posner; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
45
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grower adoption of no-tillage (NT) approaches to organic soybean production has been limited, in part because of the perceived risks of ineffective cover crop management and lack of season-long weed suppression. We conducted research in 2008 and 2009 to assess those risks by quantifying the effects of winter rye cover-crop management (tilling, crimping, or mowing), soybean planting date (mid May or early June), and row width (19 or 76 cm) on weed recruitment, emergence patterns, season-long suppression, and late-season weed community composition in transitional organic production systems. The weed plant community consisted largely of summer annual species in each year, with velvetleaf or common lambsquarters as the most abundant species. Seedling recruitment from the soil seedbank varied between years, but velvetleaf recruitment was consistently greater in the tilled rye than in the NT rye treatments. Weed emergence tended to peak early in the season in the tilled rye treatment, but in the NT rye treatments, the peak occurred in mid or late season. More-diverse summer annual and perennial species were associated with the NT rye treatments. Even so, weed suppression (as measured by late-season weed shoot mass) was much greater in crimped or mowed rye NT treatments than it was in the tilled treatment. Weed suppression among NT rye treatments was greater in 19- than in 76-row spacing treatments in each year and was greater for mid May than it was for early June planted soybean in 2009. The NT planting of soybean into standing rye before termination (crimping or mowing) facilitated timely planting of soybean, as well as effective, season-long weed suppression, suggesting that those approaches to rye and weed management are of less risk than those typically perceived by growers. Our results suggest that NT systems in winter rye provide effective weed-management alternatives to the typical tillage-intensive approach for organic soybean production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer annual weeds dominated the community, with velvetleaf or common lambsquarters most abundant.

Taxon
weedt0
Outcome
weed plant communitye0
Direction
largelye0

Verbatim

e0

“The weed plant community consisted largely of summer annual species in each year, with velvetleaf or common lambsquarters as the most abundant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Community Dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling recruitment from the soil seedbank varied between years.

Taxon
weedt0
Outcome
Seedling recruitmente0
Direction
variede0
Setting
yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling recruitment from the soil seedbank varied between years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Community Dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetleaf recruited more under tilled than no-tillage rye.

Taxon
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
tilled ryee0
Outcome
velvetleaf recruitmente0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
NT rye treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“velvetleaf recruitment was consistently greater in the tilled rye than in the NT rye treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed emergence peaked early in tilled rye.

Taxon
weedt0
Treatment
tilled rye treatmente0
Outcome
Weed emergencee0
Direction
peak earlye0

Verbatim

e0

“Weed emergence tended to peak early in the season in the tilled rye treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Community Dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed emergence peaked in mid or late season under no-tillage rye.

Taxon
weedt0
Treatment
NT rye treatmentse0
Outcome
peake0
Direction
occurrede0

Verbatim

e0

“in the NT rye treatments, the peak occurred in mid or late season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Community Dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage rye was associated with more diverse summer annual and perennial weeds.

Taxon
weedt0
Treatment
NT rye treatmentse0
Outcome
summer annual and perennial speciese0
Direction
More-diversee0

Verbatim

e0

“More-diverse summer annual and perennial species were associated with the NT rye treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Community Dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimped or mowed no-tillage rye suppressed weeds more than tilled rye.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
crimped or mowed rye NT treatmentse0
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
much greatere0
Comparator
tilled treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed suppression (as measured by late-season weed shoot mass) was much greater in crimped or mowed rye NT treatments than it was in the tilled treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed suppression was greater under 19 than 76 row spacing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
19-e0
Outcome
Weed suppressione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
76-row spacing treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed suppression among NT rye treatments was greater in 19- than in 76-row spacing treatments in each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-May soybean planting suppressed weeds more than early-June planting in 2009.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
mid Maye0
Outcome
Weed suppressione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
early June planted soybeane0
Setting
2009e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed suppression among NT rye treatments was greater in 19- than in 76-row spacing treatments in each year and was greater for mid May than it was for early June planted soybean in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting soybean into standing rye before termination facilitated timely planting.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
NT planting of soybean into standing rye before termination (crimping or mowing)e0
Outcome
timely planting of soybeane0
Direction
facilitatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NT planting of soybean into standing rye before termination (crimping or mowing) facilitated timely planting of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting soybean into standing rye before termination provided season-long weed suppression.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
NT planting of soybean into standing rye before termination (crimping or mowing)e0
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NT planting of soybean into standing rye before termination (crimping or mowing) facilitated timely planting of soybean, as well as effective, season-long weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend no-tillage winter rye as an effective alternative for weed management in organic soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
NT systems in winter ryee0
Outcome
weed-management alternativese0
Comparator
typical tillage-intensive approache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results suggest that NT systems in winter rye provide effective weed-management alternatives to the typical tillage-intensive approach for organic soybean production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑

pruning · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

tillage · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 25 positive, 19 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

pruning · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.