Claim · model-written summary
No-till always had greater giant foxtail densities than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- Glycine max
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tille4
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile4weed
- Outcome
- giant foxtail densitiese4
- Direction
- greatere4
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee4
- Setting
- Arlington, WI, and Janesville, WIe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max)”
e0“Field research was conducted at Arlington, WI, and Janesville, WI, in 1986 and 1987”
e4“no-till always had greater giant foxtail densities than conventional tillage”
Title
Douglas D. Buhler; Edward S. Oplinger Weed Science 1990. doi:10.1017/s0043174500056319
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Common lambsquarters densities were not greatly influenced by tillage systems.
- Intervention effect Redroot pigweed densities were generally highest in the chisel plow system.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage always had greater velvetleaf densities than no-till.
- Intervention effect Giant foxtail and redroot pigweed became more difficult to control when tillage was reduced.
- Intervention effect Velvetleaf became less of a problem when tillage was reduced.
- Intervention effect Several herbicide treatments provided excellent weed control.
- Intervention effect Soybean yield was not affected by tillage systems under weed-free conditions.
- Mechanism Soybean yield differences among tillage systems appeared to be due to differences in weed control.