Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Giant foxtail and redroot pigweed became more difficult to control when tillage was reduced.

A claim from Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max) · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giant foxtail and redroot pigweed became more difficult to control when tillage was reduced.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tillage was reducede5
Interactor
Giant foxtaile5weed
Second interactor
redroot pigweede5weed
Outcome
difficult to controle5
Direction
more difficulte5
Setting
Arlington, WI, and Janesville, WIe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103
e0

“Field research was conducted at Arlington, WI, and Janesville, WI, in 1986 and 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83
e5

“Giant foxtail and redroot pigweed became more difficult to control when tillage was reduced, while velvetleaf became less of a problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–689

Title

Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max)

Douglas D. Buhler; Edward S. Oplinger Weed Science 1990. doi:10.1017/s0043174500056319

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ea74780cb753af77bf1047c400d161cabff172d7dd7bdf2e918ffc86c9b9d7d1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.