Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Comparative Effect of Bioagents and Microalgae against Anthracnose (Colletotrichum capsici) Disease of Chilli (Capsicum annum L.)

Potnuri Hema Prasanthi Lakshmi; S. Simon; A. A. Lal

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A survey was conducted during Rabi 2020 - 2021 to know the severity of Anthracnose of chilli in fields ofeight villages in Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh. The disease severity ranged from 13.30 to 29.65 per cent irrespective of location surveyed. The disease severity was least in Tadikilapudi village (13.3%) and highest in kamavarapukota village (29.65%) during the month of December 2020. To manage the disease severity evaluate the efficacy of bio-agents viz.., Seed Treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens, Trichodermaviride and Microalgae.The foliar application of Neem oil is given to all the treatments. Among the Treatments disease intensity (%) was significantly decreased in treatment T6 - Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgae (16.03%). The plant height (cm) was significantly increased in treatment T6 – Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgae (62.2 cm) respectively, fruit length (cm) was significantly increased (15.96cm), yield was significantly increased in treatment T6 (128.33 q/ha) as compared to control T0.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli anthracnose severity ranged from 13.30 to 29.65 per cent across surveyed locations.

Taxon
chillie1
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Value
13.30 to 29.65 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“The disease severity ranged from 13.30 to 29.65 per cent irrespective of location surveyed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthracnose severity was lowest in Tadikilapudi village at 13.3%.

Taxon
chillie1
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
leaste0
Value
13.3%e0
Setting
Tadikilapudi villagee0

Verbatim

e0

“The disease severity was least in Tadikilapudi village (13.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthracnose severity was highest in kamavarapukota village at 29.65% in December 2020.

Taxon
chillie2
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye1
Direction
higheste0
Value
29.65%e0
Setting
kamavarapukota villagee0

Verbatim

e0

“highest in kamavarapukota village (29.65%) during the month of December 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“The disease severity was least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–281 · show in text ↑
e2

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly decreased chilli disease intensity to 16.03%.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
T6 - Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgaee0
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease intensity (%) was significantly decreased in treatment T6 - Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgae (16.03%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
t0

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased chilli plant height to 62.2 cm.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
T6 – Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgaee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
62.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (cm) was significantly increased in treatment T6 – Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgae (62.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–905 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit length significantly increased to 15.96cm under T6.

Taxon
chillie2
Treatment
T6 – Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgaee1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.96cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit length (cm) was significantly increased (15.96cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“in treatment T6 – Pseudomonas fluorescens + Trichodermaviride + microalgae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased yield to 128.33 q/ha versus control T0.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
128.33 q/hae0
Comparator
control T0e0

Verbatim

e0

“yield was significantly increased in treatment T6 (128.33 q/ha) as compared to control T0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthracnose of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.