Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Growth Indices of Bt and Non Bt High Density Planted Cotton as Influenced by Integrated Nutrient Management Practices

G. Vinay; K. P. Vani; B. Padmaja; et al.

6
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at College Farm, Agricultural College, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, during kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21 to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton. Experiment was laid out in Split plot design, with two genotypes as main plots (M) and nine Integrated Nutrient Management practices as sub-plots (S). Among genotypes, Leaf Area Index (LAI), Absolute Growth Rate (AGR), Relative Growth Rate (RGR), Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) were recorded with Bt (KCH-14 K59 BG II) compared to Non-Bt (ADB-542) during kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21. Among integrated nutrient management treatments, significantly higher LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR were observed with 100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harvest (S5) during both years and which was comparable with 100 % RDF + Foliar spray of Jeevamrutha @ 5% at 15 days interval up to harvest (S7) and 100 % RDF (S3), respectively. Finally, Bt cotton had recorded LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR than non Bt. Among integrated nutrient management practices, S5 had recorded maximum LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton KCH-14 K59 BG II had higher leaf area index, absolute growth rate and relative growth rate than non-Bt ADB-542.

Taxon
HDPS cottone3
Material
KCH-14 K59 BG IIe1
Outcome
Leaf Area Index (LAI), Absolute Growth Rate (AGR), Relative Growth Rate (RGR)e1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
Non-Bt (ADB-542)e1
Setting
field experimente2

Verbatim

e1

“Among genotypes, Leaf Area Index (LAI), Absolute Growth Rate (AGR), Relative Growth Rate (RGR), Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) were recorded with Bt (KCH-14 K59 BG II) compared to Non-Bt (ADB-542)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–580 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted at College Farm, Agricultural College, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, during kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–234 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton KCH-14 K59 BG II had higher net assimilation rate than non-Bt ADB-542.

Taxon
HDPS cottone3
Material
KCH-14 K59 BG IIe1
Outcome
Net Assimilation Rate (NAR)e1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
Non-Bt (ADB-542)e1
Setting
field experimente2

Verbatim

e1

“Among genotypes, Leaf Area Index (LAI), Absolute Growth Rate (AGR), Relative Growth Rate (RGR), Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) were recorded with Bt (KCH-14 K59 BG II) compared to Non-Bt (ADB-542)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–580 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted at College Farm, Agricultural College, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, during kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management with 100% RDF and soil Jeevamrutha application at 15-day intervals (S5) significantly increased LAI, AGR and RGR relative to other practices.

Taxon
HDPS cottone4
Treatment
100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harveste2
Outcome
LAI, AGR, RGRe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
integrated nutrient management practicese3
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at College Farm, Agricultural College, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, during kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR were observed with 100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harvest (S5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–815 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among integrated nutrient management practices, S5 had recorded maximum LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1136 · show in text ↑
e4

“to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management with 100% RDF and soil Jeevamrutha application at 15-day intervals (S5) significantly increased net assimilation rate relative to other practices.

Taxon
HDPS cottone4
Treatment
100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harveste2
Outcome
NARe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
integrated nutrient management practicese3
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted at College Farm, Agricultural College, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, during kharif 2019-20 and 2020-21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR were observed with 100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harvest (S5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–815 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among integrated nutrient management practices, S5 had recorded maximum LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1136 · show in text ↑
e4

“to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of Jeevamrutha @ 5% with 100% RDF gave growth indices comparable to S5 in LAI, AGR, RGR and NAR.

Taxon
HDPS cottone3
Treatment
100 % RDF + Foliar spray of Jeevamrutha @ 5% at 15 days interval up to harveste2
Outcome
LAI, AGR, RGR, NARe1
Direction
comparablee2
Comparator
S5e1

Verbatim

e1

“significantly higher LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR were observed with 100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harvest (S5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was comparable with 100 % RDF + Foliar spray of Jeevamrutha @ 5% at 15 days interval up to harvest (S7) and 100 % RDF (S3), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–980 · show in text ↑
e3

“to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF alone (S3) gave growth indices comparable to S5 in LAI, AGR, RGR and NAR.

Taxon
HDPS cottone3
Treatment
100 % RDF (S3)e2
Outcome
LAI, AGR, RGR, NARe1
Direction
comparablee2
Comparator
S5e1

Verbatim

e1

“significantly higher LAI, AGR, RGR, NAR were observed with 100% RDF + soil application Jeevamrutha @ 500 L ha-1 at 15 days interval up to harvest (S5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was comparable with 100 % RDF + Foliar spray of Jeevamrutha @ 5% at 15 days interval up to harvest (S7) and 100 % RDF (S3), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–980 · show in text ↑
e3

“to study the effect of genotypes and integrated nutrient management practices on growth of HDPS cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–234 · show in text ↑