Paper · 2022 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Escape resistance in fieldpea against Phytomyza horticola Goureau, as influenced by sowing time and its correlation with plant metabolites

Rajeev Kumar Yadav; Anup Chandra; Ashok Kumar Parihar; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the important, highly productive cool season food legume crops and pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis is a pest of high economic importance, associated with the crop. Twenty eight diverse field pea genotypes including checks were screened for their susceptibility to the pest and to study the influence of sowing time on the extent of infestation of pea leaf miner. The correlation of infestation with the host primary and secondary metabolites was also examined. In late sown condition, only eight genotypes were categorized as ‘Susceptible’, 2 genotypes under ‘Moderately Resistant’, 3 genotypes under ‘Intermediate’, whereas 15 genotypes were categorized as ‘Moderately Susceptible’. None of the genotypes could be categorized as ‘Very Highly Resistant’, ‘Highly Resistant’, ‘Resistant’, ‘Highly Susceptible’ and ‘Very Highly Susceptible’ in case of late planting. In case of timely planting, only 9 genotypes were categorized under ‘Moderately Susceptible’, 7 genotypes each under ‘Moderately Resistant’ and ‘Intermediate’ and 5 genotypes grouped under ‘Highly Resistant’ category. None of the genotypes categorized as ‘Susceptible’ or beyond that in case of timely planting. Most of the genotypes which showed susceptibility under late sown condition had expressed more level of resistance in the timely sown crop. Although, different fieldpea genotypes differed significantly in terms of quantity of primary and secondary metabolites estimated, only the total phenol content was found significantly and positively correlated with the per cent infestation in the late sown genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under late sowing, eight genotypes were susceptible, two moderately resistant, three intermediate and 15 moderately susceptible.

Taxon
Fieldpeae1
Material
genotypese0
Treatment
late sown conditione0
Interactor
Phytomyza horticola GoureauisPhytomyza horticolae2pest
Outcome
Susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytomyza horticola
Phytomyza horticola · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In late sown condition, only eight genotypes were categorized as ‘Susceptible’, 2 genotypes under ‘Moderately Resistant’, 3 genotypes under ‘Intermediate’, whereas 15 genotypes were categorized as ‘Moderately Susceptible’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No late planted genotypes were at the extreme resistance or susceptibility classes.

Taxon
Fieldpeae1
Treatment
late plantinge0
Interactor
Phytomyza horticola GoureauisPhytomyza horticolae2pest
Outcome
None of the genotypes could be categorizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytomyza horticola
Phytomyza horticola · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the genotypes could be categorized as ‘Very Highly Resistant’, ‘Highly Resistant’, ‘Resistant’, ‘Highly Susceptible’ and ‘Very Highly Susceptible’ in case of late planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under timely planting, nine genotypes were moderately susceptible, seven moderately resistant, seven intermediate and five highly resistant.

Taxon
Fieldpeae1
Treatment
timely plantinge0
Interactor
Phytomyza horticola GoureauisPhytomyza horticolae2pest
Outcome
Moderately Susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytomyza horticola
Phytomyza horticola · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of timely planting, only 9 genotypes were categorized under ‘Moderately Susceptible’, 7 genotypes each under ‘Moderately Resistant’ and ‘Intermediate’ and 5 genotypes grouped under ‘Highly Resistant’ category.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No timely planted genotypes were susceptible or worse.

Taxon
Fieldpeae1
Treatment
timely plantinge0
Interactor
Phytomyza horticola GoureauisPhytomyza horticolae2pest
Outcome
None of the genotypes categorized as ‘Susceptible’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytomyza horticola
Phytomyza horticola · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the genotypes categorized as ‘Susceptible’ or beyond that in case of timely planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most genotypes susceptible under late sowing expressed more resistance with timely sowing.

Taxon
Fieldpeae1
Treatment
timely sown crope0
Interactor
Phytomyza horticola GoureauisPhytomyza horticolae2pest
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
late sown conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytomyza horticola
Phytomyza horticola · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the genotypes which showed susceptibility under late sown condition had expressed more level of resistance in the timely sown crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1379 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fieldpea genotypes differed significantly in quantities of primary and secondary metabolites.

Taxon
fieldpeae0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
quantity of primary and secondary metabolitese0

Verbatim

e0

“different fieldpea genotypes differed significantly in terms of quantity of primary and secondary metabolites estimated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1509 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenol content was significantly positively correlated with percent leaf miner infestation in late sown genotypes.

Taxon
Fieldpeae1
Treatment
late sowne0
Interactor
Phytomyza horticola GoureauisPhytomyza horticolae2pest
Compound
total phenol contente0
Outcome
per cent infestatione0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytomyza horticola
Phytomyza horticola · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only the total phenol content was found significantly and positively correlated with the per cent infestation in the late sown genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1648 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fieldpea or dry pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola Goureauis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–161 · show in text ↑