Abstract
Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) effectively reduced the density of dominant Trianthema portulacastrum (2.9 No.m-2) which recorded the minimum total weed dry weight (3955 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (WCE) of 85.0 per cent. Pretilachlor plus did not exhibit any crop injury and recorded the maximum seedling growth characters and stand establishment leading to increased number of panicles (319 m). This treatment gave the best per hectare yield of 5.5 t and benefit cost ratio (B:C) of 3.12.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) produced reduced density of dominant Trianthema portulacastrum at 2.9 No.m-2.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)e0
- Interactor
- Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrume0weed - Outcome
- density of dominant Trianthema portulacastrume0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 2.9 No.m-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) effectively reduced the density of dominant Trianthema portulacastrum (2.9 No.m-2) which recorded the minimum total weed dry weight (3955 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (WCE) of 85.0 per cent.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) produced minimum total weed dry weight at 3955 g m-2.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)e0
- Outcome
- total weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 3955 g m-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) effectively reduced the density of dominant Trianthema portulacastrum (2.9 No.m-2) which recorded the minimum total weed dry weight (3955 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (WCE) of 85.0 per cent.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) produced maximum weed control efficiency at 85.0 per cent.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)e0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 85.0 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW) effectively reduced the density of dominant Trianthema portulacastrum (2.9 No.m-2) which recorded the minimum total weed dry weight (3955 g m-2) and maximum weed control efficiency (WCE) of 85.0 per cent.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pretilachlor plus showed no rice crop injury.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pretilachlor pluse0
- Outcome
- crop injurye0
- Direction
- did not exhibite0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“Pretilachlor plus did not exhibit any crop injury and recorded the maximum seedling growth characters and stand establishment leading to increased number of panicles (319 m).”
Claim · model-written summary
Pretilachlor plus gave maximum seedling growth characters and stand establishment.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pretilachlor pluse0
- Outcome
- seedling growth characters and stand establishmente0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“Pretilachlor plus did not exhibit any crop injury and recorded the maximum seedling growth characters and stand establishment leading to increased number of panicles (319 m).”
Claim · model-written summary
Pretilachlor plus increased panicle number to 319 m.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pretilachlor pluse0
- Outcome
- number of paniclese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 319 me0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“Pretilachlor plus did not exhibit any crop injury and recorded the maximum seedling growth characters and stand establishment leading to increased number of panicles (319 m).”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave the best per hectare rice yield of 5.5 t.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)e1
- Outcome
- per hectare yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 5.5 te0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“This treatment gave the best per hectare yield of 5.5 t and benefit cost ratio (B:C) of 3.12.”
e1“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave a benefit cost ratio of 3.12.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)e1
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratio (B:C)e0
- Value
- 3.12e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RICE”
e0“This treatment gave the best per hectare yield of 5.5 t and benefit cost ratio (B:C) of 3.12.”
e1“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor plus 0.3 kg a.i./ha at 3 days after seeding (DAS) with one hand weeding (HW)”
The same questions in other papers
Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
137 papers more in this group
See all 141 papers →Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
146 papers more in this group
See all 150 papers →Pretilachlor · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Pretilachlor · Trianthema portulacastrum · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
599 papers more in this group
See all 603 papers →herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
798 papers more in this group
See all 802 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.