Paper · 2023 · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science

COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF ROCKWOOL AND COTTON WOOL FOR TOMATOES PRODUCTION: NUTRIENT BALANCE, PLANT GROWTH AND FRUIT QUALITY

Grace Korter; Awe Adewole; Frederick Ojiemhende; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Rockwool and Cotton Wool as growing media for tomato production, focusing on nutrient balance, plant growth, and fruit quality. Over a period of 30 days, daily measurements of seedling germination and plant height were recorded to assess the growth dynamics. Additionally, various parameters related to nutrient availability and fruit quality were evaluated. The results indicated that both Rockwool and Cotton Wool provided favorable conditions for seedling germination and plant growth. The tomatoes started germinating at day 5 in cotton wool as against day 8 in Rockwool. The plant height was higher in cotton wool when compared to that of Rock wool. However, significant differences were observed in nutrient balance and overall performance. Cotton wool demonstrated superior nutrient retention and release properties, ensuring adequate nutrient availability for tomato plants throughout the growth period. This resulted in robust plant development, indicated by greater plant height measurements compared to Rock Wool. Moreover, the fruits produced in cotton wool showed enhanced quality attributes, such as increased size, improved taste, and higher nutrient content. The nutrient balance within the cotton wool medium positively influenced the fruit's nutritional composition, contributing to a healthier and more desirable end product. These findings suggest that cotton wool can be a more efficient growing medium compared to rock Wool for tomato production. Its superior nutrient balance, combined with enhanced plant growth and superior fruit quality, makes cotton wool a viable choice for optimizing tomato cultivation. Further research should focus on long-term evaluations and economic feasibility to validate its practical applicability in large-scale production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes germinated on day 5 in cotton wool versus day 8 in rockwool.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Treatment
cotton woole0
Outcome
tomatoes started germinatinge0
Value
day 5e0
Comparator
Rockwoole0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“tomatoes started germinating at day 5 in cotton wool as against day 8 in Rockwool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was higher in cotton wool.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Treatment
cotton woole0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Rock woole0

Verbatim

e0

“plant height was higher in cotton wool when compared to that of Rock wool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton wool retained and released nutrients better.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Treatment
Cotton woole0
Outcome
nutrient retention and release propertiese0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton wool demonstrated superior nutrient retention and release properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton wool fruit had increased size.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Treatment
cotton woole0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fruits produced in cotton wool showed enhanced quality attributes, such as increased size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton wool fruit had improved taste.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Treatment
cotton woole0
Outcome
tastee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fruits produced in cotton wool showed enhanced quality attributes, such as increased size, improved taste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton wool fruit had higher nutrient content.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Treatment
cotton woole0
Outcome
nutrient contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fruits produced in cotton wool showed enhanced quality attributes, such as increased size, improved taste, and higher nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton wool was recommended as an efficient tomato production medium.

Outcome
more efficient growing mediume0
Comparator
rock Woole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton wool can be a more efficient growing medium compared to rock Wool for tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1511 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend long-term and economic feasibility evaluations.

Taxon
TOMATOESt0
Outcome
long-term evaluations and economic feasibilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Further research should focus on long-term evaluations and economic feasibility to validate its practical applicability in large-scale production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑

Gossypium hirsutum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Gossypium hirsutum · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.