Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Interactive effects of planting pattern, supplementary irrigation and planting density on grain yield, water-nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China

Yulong Dai; Zhenqi Liao; Zhenlin Lai; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Ridge-furrow planting, supplementary irrigation and density regulation are effective measures to improve crop yields in (semi-)arid and drought-prone regions around the world, but their interactive effects on crop evapotranspiration, plant nitrogen uptake, grain yield and its components, water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of winter wheat are not fully understood. Field experiments were carried out on winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China during 2020 − 2021 and 2021 − 2022. There were two planting patterns (P): ridge-furrow planting with plastic film mulching on ridges (RF) and conventional flat planting (F), two supplementary irrigation amounts (I): 30 mm supplementary irrigation at both overwintering and returning-green stages (I60) and no supplementary irrigation (I0), and three planting densities (D): 240 × 104 plants ha−1 (LD), 360 × 104 plants ha−1 (MD) and 480 × 104 plants ha−1 (HD). The results showed that significant interactive effects of P × I, P × D, I × D and P × I × D on grain yield and water productivity of grain yield (WPg) were obtained, and the interactive effects of P × I, I × D and P × I × D on partial factor productivity of nitrogen (NPFP) and net income (NI) were significant. Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%, precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE) by 10.4%, irrigation water use efficiency (IUE) by 12.0%, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) by 5.3%, NPFP by 10.6% and NI by 17.1%. Compared with I0, I60 increased grain yield by 13.5%, WPg by 7.8%, ANUE by 5.7%, NPFP by 13.7% and NI by 27.9%. Increasing planting density improved soil water consumption, population nitrogen uptake, effective number of panicles per unit area, WPb, PIUE, ANUE, NUtE and total income. Grain yield, WPg, NPFP and NI reached the maximum values at MD under RF, because the presence of plastic film in RF reduced the number of planting rows and resulted in excessive planting density in the plant row at HD compared to F. In summary, the optimized planting density (360 ×104 plants ha−1) combined with ridge-furrow planting and supplementary irrigation is more desirable for balancing grain yield, water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of winter wheat in the semi-humid and drought-prone region of northwest China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased grain yield by 10.4% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.4%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased WPg by 11.9% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
WPge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.9%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased WPb by 6.2% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
water productivity of biomass yield (WPb)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.2%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased PIUE by 10.4% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.4%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%, precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE) by 10.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased IUE by 12.0% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiency (IUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.0%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%, precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE) by 10.4%, irrigation water use efficiency (IUE) by 12.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased ANUE by 5.3% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.3%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%, precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE) by 10.4%, irrigation water use efficiency (IUE) by 12.0%, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) by 5.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased NPFP by 10.6% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
NPFPe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.6%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%, precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE) by 10.4%, irrigation water use efficiency (IUE) by 12.0%, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) by 5.3%, NPFP by 10.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF increased NI by 17.1% compared with F.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RFe0
Outcome
NIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.1%e0
Comparator
Fe0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with F, RF increased grain yield by 10.4%, WPg by 11.9%, water productivity of biomass yield (WPb) by 6.2%, precipitation and irrigation water use efficiency (PIUE) by 10.4%, irrigation water use efficiency (IUE) by 12.0%, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) by 5.3%, NPFP by 10.6% and NI by 17.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I60 increased grain yield by 13.5% compared with I0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I60e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.5%e0
Comparator
I0e0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I0, I60 increased grain yield by 13.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I60 increased WPg by 7.8% compared with I0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I60e0
Outcome
WPge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.8%e0
Comparator
I0e0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I0, I60 increased grain yield by 13.5%, WPg by 7.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1659 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I60 increased ANUE by 5.7% compared with I0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I60e0
Outcome
ANUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.7%e0
Comparator
I0e0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I0, I60 increased grain yield by 13.5%, WPg by 7.8%, ANUE by 5.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I60 increased NPFP by 13.7% compared with I0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I60e0
Outcome
NPFPe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.7%e0
Comparator
I0e0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I0, I60 increased grain yield by 13.5%, WPg by 7.8%, ANUE by 5.7%, NPFP by 13.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I60 increased NI by 27.9% compared with I0.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I60e0
Outcome
NIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.9%e0
Comparator
I0e0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I0, I60 increased grain yield by 13.5%, WPg by 7.8%, ANUE by 5.7%, NPFP by 13.7% and NI by 27.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density improved soil water consumption, population nitrogen uptake and effective number of panicles per unit area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
soil water consumption, population nitrogen uptake, effective number of panicles per unit areae0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing planting density improved soil water consumption, population nitrogen uptake, effective number of panicles per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density improved WPb, PIUE and ANUE.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
WPb, PIUE, ANUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing planting density improved soil water consumption, population nitrogen uptake, effective number of panicles per unit area, WPb, PIUE, ANUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1854 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density improved NUtE and total income.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
NUtE and total incomee0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing planting density improved soil water consumption, population nitrogen uptake, effective number of panicles per unit area, WPb, PIUE, ANUE, NUtE and total income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1877 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, WPg and NPFP reached their maximum values at MD under RF.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MD under RFe0
Outcome
Grain yield, WPg, NPFPe0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, WPg, NPFP and NI reached the maximum values at MD under RF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1950 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NI reached its maximum value at MD under RF.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MD under RFe0
Outcome
NIe0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, WPg, NPFP and NI reached the maximum values at MD under RF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1950 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, WPg, NPFP and NI were significantly affected by interactions of planting pattern, irrigation and density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
P × I, P × D, I × D and P × I × De0
Outcome
grain yield and water productivity of grain yield (WPg)e0
Setting
semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest Chinat0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant interactive effects of P × I, P × D, I × D and P × I × D on grain yield and water productivity of grain yield (WPg) were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized planting density combined with ridge-furrow planting and supplementary irrigation is more desirable for balancing grain yield, water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ridge-furrow planting and supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
balancing grain yield, water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined with ridge-furrow planting and supplementary irrigation is more desirable for balancing grain yield, water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat in a semi-humid but drought-prone region of northwest China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–229 · show in text ↑