Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant Sciences

Reproductive Sexual Dimorphisms in Two Willow Species, Salix exigua Nutt. and Salix nigra Marshall

Nan Hu; Haley Hale; Brian Sanderson; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Premise of research. The prevalence of sexual dimorphisms, which evolve due to contrasting strategies to maximize reproductive success in males and females, is variable among dioecious plant species. In the Salicaceae, many traits have been assessed across many studies, but direct or indirect associations between these traits and reproductive allocation are often neglected. Given the dynamic evolution of sex determination systems and the strong interest in wood production in the family, we wondered whether sexual dimorphisms related to reproduction may have gone unreported. Here, we assess sexual dimorphism in reproductive traits in two species of Salix. Recognition of reproductive sexually dimorphic traits will contribute to understanding the evolution of sex determination systems in the Salicaceae. Methodology. We conducted observational studies in natural populations to assess the presence of sexual dimorphisms in early spring bud density, catkin number, and flower number per catkin across four sampling periods in Salix exigua. We also analyzed flower number and catkin number per flower in Salix nigra. Pivotal results. We observed no sexual dimorphism in preseason buds per branch in S. exigua but did find that males produced more flowers per catkin and more catkins per branch than females in both S. exigua and S. nigra. Conclusions. Higher flower numbers in males compared to females are consistent with expectations from intrasexual selection among males. The presence of reproductive sexual dimorphisms in Salix suggests that sexual selection may affect the evolution of mating strategies in Salix species and the evolution of the sex determination system within this genus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salix exigua showed no sexual dimorphism in preseason buds per branch compared with females.

Taxon
S. exiguaSalix exiguae1
Outcome
preseason buds per branche1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
femalese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We observed no sexual dimorphism in preseason buds per branch in S. exigua but did find that males produced more flowers per catkin and more catkins per branch than females in both S. exigua and S. nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1343 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Males produced more flowers per catkin than females in both Salix exigua and Salix nigra.

Taxon
S. exigua and S. nigraSalix nigraSalix exiguae1
Outcome
flowers per catkine1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
femalese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix nigra
Salix nigra · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We observed no sexual dimorphism in preseason buds per branch in S. exigua but did find that males produced more flowers per catkin and more catkins per branch than females in both S. exigua and S. nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1343 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Males produced more catkins per branch than females in both Salix exigua and Salix nigra.

Taxon
S. exigua and S. nigraSalix nigraSalix exiguae1
Outcome
catkins per branche1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
femalese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix nigra
Salix nigra · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We observed no sexual dimorphism in preseason buds per branch in S. exigua but did find that males produced more flowers per catkin and more catkins per branch than females in both S. exigua and S. nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1343 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher flower numbers in males are consistent with intrasexual selection among males.

Taxon
S. exiguaSalix exiguae1
Outcome
Higher flower numbers in malese2
Qualifier
intrasexual selection among malese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We observed no sexual dimorphism in preseason buds per branch in S. exigua but did find that males produced more flowers per catkin and more catkins per branch than females in both S. exigua and S. nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1343 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher flower numbers in males compared to females are consistent with expectations from intrasexual selection among males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1480 · show in text ↑