Paper · 1996 · Madras Agricultural Journal

INFLUENCE OF ADHESIVES AND TIME LAG BETWEEN SEED TREATMENT AND SOWING ON SURVIVAL OF RHIZOBIA AND CROP RESPONSE TO INOCULATION

UDAYASURIYAN V; SAHUL HAMEED M; ANTHONI RAJ S

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seed bacterisation is a common practice. Rice kanji is advocated to coat seeds with biofertilizers. Compared to water, rice kanji showed ten fold increase in the number of rhizobial cells adhering to red gram seed. Among the five adhesives tested for survival of inoculated rhizobia on red gram seed surface, gum arabic (40%) was the best followed by jaggery (25%). carboxymethylcellulose (1.5%), rice kanji and water. With rice kanji as adhesive on cowpea seed the inoculum load of 1.4 x 10 rhizobial cells per seed decreased to 2.2 x 10 cells after 1 h. There was no significant difference among the number of rhizobia on inoculated seeds between the time lag of 1 and 24 h. In unsterilised soil, compared to uninoculated control, significantly higher nodule dry weight and plant dry weight were observed with cowpea plants raised immediately after seed bacterisation. Nodule dry weight and plant dry weight of plants raised after a time lag of 1 to 24 h after seed inoculation were found to be on par with those of uninoculated control. Thus the crop response to rhizobial inoculation could be realised in unsterilised soil with a inoculum of 10 cells per seed but not with 102 cells per seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice kanji increased rhizobial adherence to red gram seed tenfold relative to water.

Taxon
red grame0
Treatment
rice kanjie0
Interactor
rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
number of rhizobial cells adhering to red gram seede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
ten folde0
Comparator
watere0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to water, rice kanji showed ten fold increase in the number of rhizobial cells adhering to red gram seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gum arabic was the best adhesive for survival of inoculated rhizobia on red gram seed.

Taxon
red grame0
Treatment
gum arabic (40%)e0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
survival of inoculated rhizobia on red gram seed surfacee0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
jaggery (25%)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Among the five adhesives tested for survival of inoculated rhizobia on red gram seed surface, gum arabic (40%) was the best followed by jaggery (25%). carboxymethylcellulose (1.5%), rice kanji and water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial cells per cowpea seed declined after one hour with rice kanji adhesive.

Treatment
rice kanjie0
Interactor
rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
rhizobial cells per seede0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.2 x 10 cellse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With rice kanji as adhesive on cowpea seed the inoculum load of 1.4 x 10 rhizobial cells per seed decreased to 2.2 x 10 cells after 1 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial counts on inoculated seeds did not differ significantly between one and 24 hours.

Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
number of rhizobia on inoculated seedse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference among the number of rhizobia on inoculated seeds between the time lag of 1 and 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“CROP RESPONSE TO INOCULATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“With rice kanji as adhesive on cowpea seed the inoculum load of 1.4 x 10 rhizobial cells per seed decreased to 2.2 x 10 cells after 1 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea nodule and plant dry weights were higher after immediate seed bacterisation than in uninoculated controls.

Treatment
seed bacterisatione0
Interactor
rhizobiat0symbiont
Outcome
nodule dry weight and plant dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0
Setting
unsterilised soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In unsterilised soil, compared to uninoculated control, significantly higher nodule dry weight and plant dry weight were observed with cowpea plants raised immediately after seed bacterisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“SURVIVAL OF RHIZOBIA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea nodule and plant dry weights after a one to 24 hour inoculation lag were on par with uninoculated controls.

Treatment
seed inoculatione0
Interactor
rhizobiat0symbiont
Outcome
Nodule dry weight and plant dry weighte0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodule dry weight and plant dry weight of plants raised after a time lag of 1 to 24 h after seed inoculation were found to be on par with those of uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“SURVIVAL OF RHIZOBIA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“With rice kanji as adhesive on cowpea seed the inoculum load of 1.4 x 10 rhizobial cells per seed decreased to 2.2 x 10 cells after 1 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop response to rhizobial inoculation was realized at 10 cells per seed but not 102 cells per seed in unsterilised soil.

Treatment
10 cells per seede0
Interactor
rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
crop response to rhizobial inoculatione0
Comparator
102 cells per seede0
Setting
unsterilised soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus the crop response to rhizobial inoculation could be realised in unsterilised soil with a inoculum of 10 cells per seed but not with 102 cells per seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“CROP RESPONSE TO INOCULATION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“With rice kanji as adhesive on cowpea seed the inoculum load of 1.4 x 10 rhizobial cells per seed decreased to 2.2 x 10 cells after 1 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–554 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.